Liberal Film Critic Roeper Slams 9/11 Conspiracy Nuts

Quote from Bitstream:

since when one building comin' down bring down in sympathy buildings in the vicinity...and why only t7.
More...


yes there were a lot of other buildings much much closer to the Towers that fell that sustained more damage but somehow managed to stay upright...
 
Quote from EqtTrdr:

yes there were a lot of other buildings much much closer to the Towers that fell that sustained more damage but somehow managed to stay upright...
More...

considerin' the strenght of t7 it is unprobable to say the least it came down 'cause of vibrations [damage wasn't any where near enough]; this would te the first case in history.
 
"Are you really as fucking stupid as you appear?"

Tempting fate, are you?

Quote from Pabst:

You're making many stupid assertions that you don't know the answers to. First off, analog cell phones work perfectly at high altitudes. As do those credit card phones in the back of the seats. Only digital cells have probs. So can you tell me what types of phones passengers were using? For all you know the only calls that made it out were from non-digital phones. Now granted, i know you have the IQ of a thimble but WHY THE FUCK would CELLPHONES be so IMPORTANT TO THE "PLOT" that anyone would GO TO THE TROUBLE of forging them? As if Dick Cheney said"well we better document some calls from the plane to loved ones or else NO IDIOT ON ELITE TRADER WILL BELIEVE THERE WERE PLANE CRASHES!!" Are you really as fucking stupid as you appear?
More...
 
This is what you want to believe. Just admit it. Come clean. However, if you truly have an open mind but confused by the noise of anti-American propaganda, I will spend the time discussing the laws of physics and engineering and spell it all out to you. Bsmeter will say the laws of physics and engineering is a Jewish conspiracy. May as well talk to my pet Dog about 9/11. I think you are better than that.
Quote from Bitstream:

considerin' the strenght of t7 it is unprobable to say the least it came down 'cause of vibrations [damage wasn't any where near enough]; this would te the first case in history.
More...
 
Quote from Sam123:

This is what you want to believe. Just admit it. Come clean. However, if you truly have an open mind but confused by the noise of anti-American propaganda, I will spend the time discussing the laws of physics and engineering and spell it all out to you. Bsmeter will say the laws of physics and engineering is a Jewish conspiracy. May as well talk to my pet Dog about 9/11. I think you are better than that.
More...

i wanna a past example of a buildin' of that size and strenght collapsin' on its own weight just like b7 did when it felt compassion for the towers.
will get back to u tomorrow, its 4.14am here.

by the way this aint anti american, is definetly pro-usa, seekin' for the truth, but sure is anti government.
 
I still don't see anyone in the 10 threads so far on the topic of WTC7 who actually believes the government's version of the story give me a good explanation as to why WTC7 collapsed....

All they can do is call people names and say if you think there is another side to this story you are a moron and hate America...... amazing.


WAKE UP please....


WHERE IN THE F*ck DO YOU SEE IN THIS PICTURE FIRES HOT ENOUGH TO COLLAPSE THIS BUILDING ???

wtc7.gif

Simple logic....

If the towers fell because jet fuel was supposedly able to cause the fires in the building to burn hot enough to melt steel ..... and there was no jet fuel in WTC7.... what caused the same steel to suddenly lower it's melting point and collapse??

Please let me know.. thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top