LGBT - Terror

[conduit]

Wtf, which visa process is tougher? Are you kidding me? You probably carried a handgun in your bag hence you faced "certain issues" goodness. I travel to Canada each and every year and hardly anywhere in the world are officers more professional and respectful while doing their duty. The process could not be easier.

I know you live in Canada, and when I went there, the Visa application process was a lot tougher than the US. Therefore, I don't understand why everyone feels free to complain that the US wants to bring the standards up...if other countries are so great, why not bring their standards down then?

 

[conduit]

So now you are leaning to a religious motivation and not terrorism. Thank you

Imam Who Preached in Orlando Two Months Ago Advocates Death For Gays

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiep...rlando-two-months-ago-gays-must-dies-n2177023

 

[gwb-trading]

Orlando Shooter Was Reportedly a Regular at Pulse and Had a Profile on Gay Dating App
http://gawker.com/orlando-shooter-was-reportedly-a-regular-at-pulse-and-h-1781920316

 

[conduit]

Very easy answer. Because nobody looks to punish Americans, but a majority wants to have certain types of weapons Banned. See the difference? You advocating banning a whole people, the other side chooses to focus on the object of the crime which is not a whole ethnic or religious group but automatic assault weapons, for example.

So I have a couple question for the lefties. If we should not judge and punish all Muslims because of the act of this one man, why must we judge and punish all American gun owners as a result of this one mans actions? If we should not pass laws that affect all Muslims as a result of this one mans actions, why must we pass laws that will affect every American as a result of this one mans actions? Why must we use laser like focus on the actions of this one man, careful not to include any other people, but paint with a very broad brush when judging Americans with little or no regard to the individual?

 

[nitro]

So now you are leaning to a religious motivation and not terrorism. Thank you

I am not leaning to anything. I am collecting what I hope are facts.

But religion has a long long history of terrorism, so connecting the two is not surprising to me in any sense.

 

[piezoe]

If we should not judge and punish all Muslims because of the act of this one man, why must we judge and punish all American gun owners as a result of this one mans actions? If we should not pass laws that affect all Muslims as a result of this one mans actions, why must we pass laws that will affect every American as a result of this one mans actions?

The first question assumes something that is not true, so no answer is needed, unless you consider requiring that a more sporting firearm be substituted for your Sig Sauer MCX rifle, with 30 rounds in the clip, on your next trip to the rifle range a "punishment" like "time-out" in the first grade. The second question seems to be better one, but isn't when closely examined. No one is or has suggested passing any law based on the actions of one man. In fact, you can leave the Orlando affair as an aside.

 

[conduit]

I really really hope you are trading and funded your account well

A faction is a smaller portion of a larger group that breaks away from it. A faction might take a fraction of the people from a large group and start a new group.

We are at war with the Islamic state of Irag and Syria (ISIS). ISIS is a faction of Islam.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_of_Iraq_and_the_Levant

The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, IPA /ˈaɪsᵻl/), also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria[note 1] (ISIS, /ˈaɪsᵻs/),[31] and by its Arabic language acronym Daesh (داعش‎ dāʿish, IPA: [ˈdaːʕiʃ]),[32][33] is a Salafi jihadist militant group that follows an Islamic fundamentalist, Wahhabi doctrine of Sunni Islam.[34]

 

[Nine_Ender]

So you have no proof? You just made it all up?

You are following the libtard protocol. When losing and argument, make personal attacks.

I cannot see any circumstance where the term "libtard" is useful and not a personal attack. I cannot credit you with having a reasonable amount of intelligence and a mature social awareness if you use that term. I gave you some credit initially in the discussion but you started with the labels meant to demean others entirely off topic.

 

[conduit]

You just can't stand the truth.

Typically I don't like to put people on ignore because I do enjoy a good debate, and I'm always ready to accept the fact that I can learn something of value from people with different points of view. However, I must make an exception in your case as you're just a little too fucking stupid to continue this conversation. Bye!

 

[conduit]

Too many people? You do know how your population density compares with Japan, and China or Hongkong? Who is completely illogical here...

Can't hurt, but I doubt that's the answer to our problems. Somewhere along the line we went down a wrong path and it's led us into this horribly divided world. Perhaps we spent too much time celebrating our diversity when we should have been concentrating on unity. I don't pretend to know the answer, but it's painfully obvious we're in a bad spot. Maybe it's just there are too many f'n people, and given the rule of at least 10% of any group will be malcontents, that number grows proportionately as the population grows. We are now overwhelmed by the tyranny of the not so few.