LGBT - Terror

[Frederick Foresight]

Perfection is impossible, progress is not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_is_the_enemy_of_good

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Radical Islam is nothing but driven by hate. Of course it's an anti gay crime. Radical Islam is violently anti gay.

Seems like we have a few sympathizers here:

This is a terrible tragedy. Just awful.

What's for lunch?

We have the cure for AIDS!! Islam to the rescue!

If they had a single brain in their head between them they'd be ashamed of themselves.

 

[Ricter]

Because banning the manufacture doesn't mean they won't be manufactured elsewhere, and in a big way.

That's true, and Australia's experience banning them proves the mass shootings are still going to happen just as often.

 

[Ricter]

Seems like we have a few sympathizers here:



If they had a single brain in their head between them they'd be ashamed of themselves.

Indeed. Shooter's dad says his kid was offended by males kissing. Sounds like our very own "hairy stinking assholes" poster here.

 

[conduit]

So are you finally agreeing that certain types of weapons should be more heavily regulated than others? If a few lives can be saved even in the face of terror would that not already be an achievement?

Because banning the manufacture doesn't mean they won't be manufactured elsewhere, and in a big way. Should an AR-15 be more difficult to purchase than a shotgun? IMO, yes, it should be a much more lengthy and laborious process. However, that does not do much to thwart the real threat, which is this case was Radical Islam. We might stop the Adam Lanaza types, which is no small thing, but gang violence and Islamic terrorism are a whole different breed of animals. The left loves to conflate the two, but fighting against gangs/terrorists is very different battle than the mentally disturbed types. Terrorists and gangs will find their weapons regardless of any laws we pass.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

That's true, and Australia's experience banning them proves the mass shootings are still going to happen just as often.

Yeah, really.

US gun enthusiasts prefer to double down, hereinafter referred to as doing "The Full Donald."

As noted in my earlier link, the perfect is the enemy of the good. And so, while the gun sniffers would be willing to "consider" a perfect solution to the gun problem, anything falling short of perfection would be worse than doing nothing at all. And so they "stand their ground," so to speak.

 

[jem]

so we have a terrorist act by a guy with a middle eastern muslim background against gays...

and yet we see the leftists disturbed work on this thread

nitro quotes the bible. (this is twisted and maybe sick)
ricter misdirects as much as he can
and covertibility tries to first blame the teaparty and then make a a joke about the tea parties intelligence.
and we have freddie douching from canada with his zero content ways. .

what the hell is wrong with you lefties? seriously. you have to politicize this already and do it in a dishonest and imo a twisted manner. You all need to examine your ability to see the world clearly.

by the way covert...

Poll Finds Tea Party Backers Wealthier and More Educated
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html?_r=0

Oh so you were posting a stock image of the weapon and not specifically his weapon.

Funny ya don't ever see a Gadsden Flag sticker on a science book.

 

[nitro]

Trump gets self-congratulatory after Orlando mass shooting

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/break...r-orlando-mass-shooting/ar-AAgWV1t?li=BBnbcA1

 

[Covertibility]

you haters even lie about your hate.

Poll Finds Tea Party Backers Wealthier and More Educated
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html?_r=0

Those Tea Party people had to be Pat Buchanan's people and not the idiots that showed up after Obama was elected.

 

[CaptainObvious]

So are you finally agreeing that certain types of weapons should be more heavily regulated than others? If a few lives can be saved even in the face of terror would that not already be an achievement?

I'm not "finally" coming around to anything. I have always been in favor of a more intense screening process for gun ownership, and have written that several times. I also believe that there should be extensive training that goes along with that ownership. I do not support banning these weapons because bans don't, and won't bring the desired results.