LGBT - Terror

Imo Obama is correctly using caution when assigning blame or not in these cases. It is best to let the evidence play out, and not jump to conclusions. Soon, every attack by a Muslim will be attached to Daesh, and that is also dangerous since there is Al-Queida and other terror organizations possible of these atrocities.

That said, these lone wolfs are rarely alone, and you don't need direct evidence to see the obvious. And it isn't just lone wolf, I would add, home grown:

A Lone-Wolf Terrorist Is Never Quite Alone

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...6/06/why_isis_loves_lone_wolf_terrorists.html
 
We should all use caution in judgment. I have no issue calling the thing by its name once it is established. But in thus case the only fact relating him to the outside of the US is his two pilgrimages to Saudi Arabia. That in itself means nothing more than him taking his religious belief seriously. If evidence is unearthed that his killings and the plan thereof relate to outsiders then that would obviously change the picture.

nitro said:
Imo Obama is correctly using caution when assigning blame or not in these cases. It is best to let the evidence play out, and not jump to conclusions. Soon, every attack by a Muslim will be attached to Daesh, and that is also dangerous since there is Al-Queida and other terror organizations possible of these atrocities.

That said, these lone wolfs are rarely alone, and you don't need direct evidence to see the obvious. And it isn't just lone wolf, I would add, home grown:

A Lone-Wolf Terrorist Is Never Quite Alone

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...6/06/why_isis_loves_lone_wolf_terrorists.html
More...
 
yes... lets use caution after the fact... but not use caution to prevent future terrorism.

does not ever public statement this president makes annoy the crap out of those with common sense.
 
conduit said:
We should all use caution in judgment. I have no issue calling the thing by its name once it is established. But in thus case the only fact relating him to the outside of the US is his two pilgrimages to Saudi Arabia. That in itself means nothing more than him taking his religious belief seriously. If evidence is unearthed that his killings and the plan thereof relate to outsiders then that would obviously change the picture.
More...

In his low paying job where did he get the money to make these "pilgrimages"?
 
Ricter said:
Guns are still being manufactured in places other than Australia. What's their mass shooting rate since the ban?
More...
Are there other countries that border Australia?

Does Australia have a country that borders it to the south with large drug cartels?
 
jem said:
distorted? irrational... what the heck are you and your friend talking about.

What is irrational, is letting groups of people into our country when you know a percentage of them are terrorists and the head of homeland security said we are not able to properly screen the terrorists out. There is no law that says we have to let immigrants into our country. So lets now do it til we can properly screen.

what is irrational is blaming these mass shootings done by muslims extremists on conservatives.
There is nothing conservative about muslim terrorists.
More...

Using your logic, we shouldn't let Americans into Canada under any circumstances. A certain percentage of Americans are terrorists. There is no law that says we have to let Americans into our country. Americans are on average more violent and commit more crimes then Canadians, and are more likely to own firearms. Many recent murders in Toronto were committed with fire arms traced directly to purchases in the US. The guns were illegally brought to Canada.

Should we ban all Americans from Canada until we see your crime rates under control and/or you institute gun control more similar to our own system ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top