So here's what I'd like to do: Leverage 4x a bond ETF like MUB. For the sake of this discussion, I'd like to focus on the mechanics of doing this rather than the investment itself.
What I've done so far: I bought MUB through a Reg-T account at ~1.9 leverage.
Problem: As mentioned, I'd like to increase my leverage to 4x. This is not possible with Reg-T because margin is effectively 50%. Whereas I can do intraday trading at 25% (4x), I intend to hold the bond fund long-term so overnight margin of 50% applies; my leverage max is near 2x while having some margin cushion.
What I'm considering: Looking at Portfolio Margin which is risk-based and where initial and maintenance margin may be 15-30%. Where I'm confused is that PM seems to reward portfolios- perhaps because different securities can be combined to lower volatility. What I want to know is that if I want to accomplish my purpose, would it be sufficient to simply opt for PM (with $110K minimum) and purchase MUB? My thinking is if I could get a PM margin % of 15% on this investment, I could safely 4x leverage and have margin cushion.
When I used "Try Portfolio Margin" in IB TWS, it seemed to indicate the margin of PM would be similar to Maint Margin in Reg-T; or 25%. Since initial margin and maint margin are the same in Portfolio Margin, I took this to mean that MUB would get a PM% (and therefore including Initial Margin) of 25%. However, I would prefer it to be lower (closer to 15%) so I can do 4x and have margin cushion. I'm not sure why it would be so high given that this investment does not fluctuate very much at all (max of 3% loss for a calendar year in last 5 years; and had a 1% positive return in 2008).
Need guidance from people with experience with IB Portfolio Margin.
What I've done so far: I bought MUB through a Reg-T account at ~1.9 leverage.
Problem: As mentioned, I'd like to increase my leverage to 4x. This is not possible with Reg-T because margin is effectively 50%. Whereas I can do intraday trading at 25% (4x), I intend to hold the bond fund long-term so overnight margin of 50% applies; my leverage max is near 2x while having some margin cushion.
What I'm considering: Looking at Portfolio Margin which is risk-based and where initial and maintenance margin may be 15-30%. Where I'm confused is that PM seems to reward portfolios- perhaps because different securities can be combined to lower volatility. What I want to know is that if I want to accomplish my purpose, would it be sufficient to simply opt for PM (with $110K minimum) and purchase MUB? My thinking is if I could get a PM margin % of 15% on this investment, I could safely 4x leverage and have margin cushion.
When I used "Try Portfolio Margin" in IB TWS, it seemed to indicate the margin of PM would be similar to Maint Margin in Reg-T; or 25%. Since initial margin and maint margin are the same in Portfolio Margin, I took this to mean that MUB would get a PM% (and therefore including Initial Margin) of 25%. However, I would prefer it to be lower (closer to 15%) so I can do 4x and have margin cushion. I'm not sure why it would be so high given that this investment does not fluctuate very much at all (max of 3% loss for a calendar year in last 5 years; and had a 1% positive return in 2008).
Need guidance from people with experience with IB Portfolio Margin.
