Level heads prevail, NPR fires Attorney after hate filled rant aimed at conservatives caught on tape

[gwb-trading]

I actually think NPR is the most unbiased news source that we have in the country anymore.

I actually view Reuters and AP as the most unbiased news sources in the U.S.

Here is an article that evaluates news source bias and reliability.

Who is the Least Biased News Source? Simplifying the News Bias Chart
https://towardsdatascience.com/how-statistically-biased-is-our-news-f28f0fab3cb3

 

[userque]

It’s funny you think NPR is conservative.

I was referring to you.

 

[Wallet]

You do know that we know this list and see how Trump and his new party use it as a template.

NPR not being an echo chamber for obvious bullshit does not make it a left wing.

View attachment 248910

Nor right wing as userque implied. The point of this thread is the fact that NPR did not succumb to the current anti-right dogma by giving the Attorney a pass when his remarks were aimed at Trump backers. They were fair in their judgment. Hatred is hatred regardless of political affiliation.

What the Left fails to understand, Trump didn’t create, ”Trumpism” or whatever you want to call it. He just cashed in on it.

This Attorney just echoed the “woke hatred of everything right” ideology Conservatives believe has entrenched itself in today’s political and academic circles. Fly-overs, Deplorables, list goes on.....the Left has developed an elitist, hypocritical attitude that excludes half the population. Liberals themselves are to blame.

Their ongoing actions only fuel the fire.

 

[userque]

Nor right wing as userque implied.

My message is that you, and other cons, accept cancel culture when the cancelee is a dem. But you reject it when it is a con. I merely wanted to make sure any GOP members wondering about what they see when they look in the mirror, to consider that fact.

The point of this thread is the fact that NPR did not succumb to the current anti-right dogma.

NPR acted appropriately. @Here4money also said as much, imo. When do cons ever agree when a con is "canceled?" They typically whine "CANCEL CULTURE!!!" regardless the facts-circumstances

What the Left fails to understand, Trump didn’t create, ”Trumpism” or whatever you want to call it. He just cashed in on it.

Trump did create it. Regardless, he stoked it. Your point?

This Attorney just echoed the “woke hatred of everything right” ideology Conservatives believe has entrenched itself in today’s political and academic circles.

You yourself just suggested that NPR is not con. So no, the hatred is not entrenched. I just mentioned that me and another non-con here also agreed with the NPR response. So again, not entrenched. You're falsely profiling.

Fly-overs, Deplorables, list goes on.....the Left has developed an elitist, hypocritical attitude that excludes half the population.

So, The Right hasn't? I believe I just illustrated Right hypocrisy using you as an example.

Their ongoing actions only fuel the fire.

Did the Left fuel fire by invading The Capitol Building? Or are we only counting stuff that happened after that?

 

[Wallet]

My message is that you, and other cons, accept cancel culture when the cancelee is a dem. But you reject it when it is a con. I merely wanted to make sure any GOP members wondering about what they see when they look in the mirror, to consider that fact.



NPR acted appropriately. @Here4money also said as much, imo. When do cons ever agree when a con is "canceled?" They typically whine "CANCEL CULTURE!!!" regardless the facts-circumstances



Trump did create it. Regardless, he stoked it. Your point?



You yourself just suggested that NPR is not con. So no, the hatred is not entrenched. I just mentioned that me and another non-con here also agreed with the NPR response. So again, not entrenched. You're falsely profiling.



So, The Right hasn't? I believe I just illustrated Right hypocrisy using you as an example.



Did the Left fuel fire by invading The Capitol Building? Or are we only counting stuff that happened after that?

Here4money questioned if the guys remark was wrong, That’s agreeing? Yes he said NPR is non-partisan, but he can’t post it without some type of inflammatory jab.

It’s a waist of my time to rehash other posts in this thread. If you truly believe there’s no anti-conservative bias in the MSM, Big Tech and today’s Academia..... enjoy your little fantasy. It’s apparent to half the country.

 

[Cuddles]

Here4money questioned if the guys remark was wrong, That’s agreeing? Yes he said NPR is non-partisan, but he can’t post it without some type of inflammatory jab.

It’s a waist of my time to rehash other posts in this thread. If you truly believe there’s no anti-conservative bias in the MSM, big tech and today’s Academia..... enjoy your little fantasy. It’s apparent to half the country.

that's because facts don't care about your feelings, which is why cons have a victimhood complex when it comes to the media and academia

 

[Wallet]

that's because facts don't care about your feelings, which is why cons have a victimhood complex when it comes to the media and academia

Your agreement that children should be taken from their parents when they don’t align with your political philosophy proves my point.

 

[Cuddles]

Your agreement that children should be taken from their parents when they don’t align with your political philosophy proves my point.

your side argued children should be taken from their parents at the border & actually did it, your point?

 

[userque]

If you truly believe there’s no anti-conservative bias in the MSM, Big Tech and today’s Academia..... enjoy your little fantasy.

Yes, the infrastructure of this democratic country is anti-con. The real question you should be asking is ... why?

 

[Wallet]

your side argued children should be taken from their parents at the border & actually did it, your point?

False equivalence and false news, problems arise when illegal immigrants try to “re-enter” once being deported or have a record, that’s a felony and they are treated no different than any felon. Most of the time it’s a space issue, there are only so many family units. Also cartels plant children in groups as families are given better treatment than individuals, these children are placed in DHS care.

Incoming families are offered a return ticket to home, they choose to stay.

You support separating children because you oppose their parents political views.