Letting 'em all in the ring

Heck of an argument you just made, heck of an argument.

LOL....

But, keep up the stalking, to show everyone just how badly you were beaten up....

Quote from traderNik:

Stick to hocus pocus and name-calling, Z. You're badly out of your element (intellectual dishonesty and evasions) here, and making yourself look even more riduculous than usual.
 
Quote from stu:

Do you see how your comment could be said not to have been subjected to Intelligent Design?

Oh Course. Im not stupid. I never claimed as "fact" the existence of the D in ID. Although, that's just beause I'm not devote.

You know the answer is unknowable as a fact? . Is that what your "fact" says about anything and everything not yet known - that it is unknowable ? Who would want to suggest such a thing?



I know that the quesiton of where "things" ultimately began is unknowable to be a fact, as much as I'm sitting here typing. So roughly,... about 99.99+% probability. It's a circular argument, with no end and will always remaind so ... "Who created the creator of the creator of the creator. .... How did all these particles materialize in the first place, from other particles, well where did these other particles come from, from other particles ..."



There is other than Random chance or ID.

Name it. (Space Aliens seeding colonies?)

To strive to fill this void with facts, based upon those such as " a dropped ball falls to earth every single time, for everyone eveywhere, throughout history " - theory of gravity facts , you are surely more likely to be more correct than anyone.What is sickening about that ? Where is the mocking? What is there so mocking about questioning ID'ers beliefs?

Are you suggesting that relgious people aren't regularly mocked and ridiculed?

Hint: Read the opening post on this thread.



Some may say that to form a false argument about being mocked so you can infer others are being intolerant, is only an example of yourself being dishonest AND intolerant.

Excuse me. Beg your pardon? See http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=non sequitur

I think your example is that of someone playing the victim, or just bullshitting.

 
Obviously, I'm not a biologist nor have I studied Darwin extensively. I do know that in his later years he became a Christian and was appalled by the use of his theory to attempt to undermine religious belief.

As for the specifics, it is clear that what actually happened at Creation cannot be proved. So it is at best theory, not fact. As for Darwinism, of course we can observe numerous examples of survival of the fittest. In simple life forms like bacteria, we can see the growth of mutant species.

By contrast, there is no fossil record of trans-species mutation, eg a fish becoming a reptile. Certainly there are species that appear to share common characteristics, eg vestigial limbs or organs. There are also species that share a common anatomy, eg a dog's front leg closely resembles the bones in your arm.

Evolution believers point to these as proof, but in all fairness, they are just as much proof of the contrary. Wouldn't we expect a common designer to reuse perfectly good designs, suitably modified for the particular species?
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Heck of an argument you just made, heck of an argument.

LOL....

But, keep up the stalking, to show everyone just how badly you were beaten up....

Lmao Beetlebrow, everyone's "stalking" you? The night before last you had about a dozen guys from every religious and political stripe basically calling you a retard. You've alienated yourself from everyone on this board. I suggest you log on an alt and give yourself one supporting vote.

Edit: btw TraderNik, grats. I too have had Beetlebrow frothing at the mouth this week. We've outtrolled the troll, lol.
 
Ya shithead, like you the goons follow me around to take their impotent shots and puke up their juvenile logical fallacy (like your generalization fallacy in the comments below)...simply because they got shot down on another thread at some point in the past, and can't let go of the resentments they carry.

Hey, if you clowns want to lug your baggage, damaged ego and burning resentments around, and then display it repeatedly on thread after thread where your comments have nothing to do with topic, whining like little bitches, I will be quite happy to point it out as I watch you lick your own balls like a mangy old dog....

Quote from Ricter:

Lmao Beetlebrow, everyone's "stalking" you? The night before last you had about a dozen guys from every religious and political stripe basically calling you a retard. You've alienated yourself from everyone on this board. I suggest you log on an alt and give yourself one supporting vote.

Edit: btw TraderNik, grats. I too have had Beetlebrow frothing at the mouth this week. We've outtrolled the troll, lol.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Ya shithead, like you the goons follow me around to take their impotent shots and their logical fallacy (like your generalization fallacy in the comments below)...simply because they got shot down on another thread at some point in the past.

Hey, if you clowns want to carry your baggage and resentments around, and display it on thread after thread, I will be there to point it out....

Lol Beetlebrow.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Ya shithead, like you the goons... impotent shots ... puke up their juvenile logical fallacy ... you clowns ... whining like little bitches... watch you lick your own balls like a mangy old dog.... pull the stick outa your A-hole...shitface..

Yes, Z is having a really bad week and you can just tell how frustrated he's getting by the tone of his posts.

Isn't it interesting how this sanctimonious little prick suddenly reverts to gutter talk whenever he gets owned. He professes to such spirituality and a personal relationship with God. In fact he's a liar and, as evidenced by his comments regarding jokes about pedophilic attacks on the children of another ET member, apparently a moral monster as well.

I was listening to an interview with Katharine Jefferts Schori, the newly elected Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church (I think that's the right appelation). Now this is my kind of Christian - all business, no nonsense, no mapping of her personal preferences on others, no problems with the lifestyles of her parishioners (or whatever they're called), no problem talking about the problems in the Church (you should have heard her destroy the argument that since homosexuality is biblically proscribed, homosexuals should be prevented from taking management positions in the church), and not interested in proselytizing in the least. Her bag is 'our job is to do good acts'. What a breath of fresh air.
 
Tripe....

Quote from traderNik:

Yes, Z is having a really bad week and you can just tell how frustrated he's getting by the tone of his posts.

Isn't it interesting how this sanctimonious little prick suddenly reverts to gutter talk whenever he gets owned. He professes to such spirituality and a personal relationship with God. In fact he's a liar and, as evidenced by his comments regarding jokes about pedophilic attacks on the children of another ET member, apparently a moral monster as well.

I was listening to an interview with Katharine Jefferts Schori, the newly elected Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church (I think that's the right appelation). Now this is my kind of Christian - all business, no nonsense, no mapping of her personal preferences on others, no problems with the lifestyles of her parishioners (or whatever they're called), no problem talking about the problems in the Church (you should have heard her destroy the argument that since homosexuality is biblically proscribed, homosexuals should be prevented from taking management positions in the church), and not interested in proselytizing in the least. Her bag is 'our job is to do good acts'. What a breath of fresh air.
 
Parrot brain...

Quote from traderNik:

Heck of an argument you just made, heck of an argument.

LOL....

But, keep up the stalking, to show everyone just how badly you were beaten up....
 
Back
Top