M
morganist
Quote and Answer ZTrader888.
I don't think U.S. tax law would permit your model. The government is in the business of spending money, not making it. It generates revenue via taxes. Pension funds in the U.S. fall under for-profit SEC laws I think.
Answer: I am trying to get the government to make its own money stop them from taking so much in taxes. This should help the economy to grow. I was hoping the government would introduce new pension products being involved in the new product development and licensing process to charge a direct commission for use. The government can alter pension regulations to make the system more efficient.
As regards inflation, monetary policy in the U.S. has held inflation in check to the point where negative inflation was even discussed (also not a good thing).
Answer: The problem with using the interest rate to control the economy inflation in particular is that it tends to put the inflation control target as a more important factor than the commercial aspect of the interest rate. For example interest rates should be higher to reflect risk but the central bank lowers the interest rate to hit economic targets. The other side of this is when inflation is high and interest rates rise and it causes defaults. A simple change to the amount that can be saved in a pension contribution each month can easy accomplish the same outcome as an alteration in the interest rate without the consequences and with some advantages too.
In the U.S. the bond market usually covers the increase in debt - the Fed just issued a new 20 year bond and is seriously discussing a 100 bond issue. The U.S. dollar is still the reserve currency - and that's why countries buy our bonds at auction - because their currencies are generally not worth much.
Answer: If it is treasury bonds tax payers have to pay it back with interest and it becomes expensive. With pension saving alterations no interest repayment is required just a change in pension saving habits. It can also impact currency value and other macroeconomic functions if too much treasury debt is issued. If it is corporate bonds it may be beneficial and help to provide secure fixed income for pension funds something I approve of.
If we ever went back on the gold standard, perhaps your model would be of use. But the way I see it, what works for the EU and other countries doesn't necessarily work in the U.S.
Also another thing - the UK can't pay for its entitlements - its healthcare system is no better than a third world country. Unemployment is high and manufacturing is practically ancient history. I don't see how your model helps any of that at all. Perhaps you can explain.
Answer: Unemployment is not high it is at the lowest levels ever recorded and dropped around the time they started using pension reforms. In terms of the healthcare system it is expensive I agree but irrelevant to my work.
I reckon I can get my model working one way or another and it can at least be used as a backup. It is simple if inflation rises too much then increase pension saving alternatively if economic growth is low then optimise the pension system.
I don't think U.S. tax law would permit your model. The government is in the business of spending money, not making it. It generates revenue via taxes. Pension funds in the U.S. fall under for-profit SEC laws I think.
Answer: I am trying to get the government to make its own money stop them from taking so much in taxes. This should help the economy to grow. I was hoping the government would introduce new pension products being involved in the new product development and licensing process to charge a direct commission for use. The government can alter pension regulations to make the system more efficient.
As regards inflation, monetary policy in the U.S. has held inflation in check to the point where negative inflation was even discussed (also not a good thing).
Answer: The problem with using the interest rate to control the economy inflation in particular is that it tends to put the inflation control target as a more important factor than the commercial aspect of the interest rate. For example interest rates should be higher to reflect risk but the central bank lowers the interest rate to hit economic targets. The other side of this is when inflation is high and interest rates rise and it causes defaults. A simple change to the amount that can be saved in a pension contribution each month can easy accomplish the same outcome as an alteration in the interest rate without the consequences and with some advantages too.
In the U.S. the bond market usually covers the increase in debt - the Fed just issued a new 20 year bond and is seriously discussing a 100 bond issue. The U.S. dollar is still the reserve currency - and that's why countries buy our bonds at auction - because their currencies are generally not worth much.
Answer: If it is treasury bonds tax payers have to pay it back with interest and it becomes expensive. With pension saving alterations no interest repayment is required just a change in pension saving habits. It can also impact currency value and other macroeconomic functions if too much treasury debt is issued. If it is corporate bonds it may be beneficial and help to provide secure fixed income for pension funds something I approve of.
If we ever went back on the gold standard, perhaps your model would be of use. But the way I see it, what works for the EU and other countries doesn't necessarily work in the U.S.
Also another thing - the UK can't pay for its entitlements - its healthcare system is no better than a third world country. Unemployment is high and manufacturing is practically ancient history. I don't see how your model helps any of that at all. Perhaps you can explain.
Answer: Unemployment is not high it is at the lowest levels ever recorded and dropped around the time they started using pension reforms. In terms of the healthcare system it is expensive I agree but irrelevant to my work.
I reckon I can get my model working one way or another and it can at least be used as a backup. It is simple if inflation rises too much then increase pension saving alternatively if economic growth is low then optimise the pension system.