I feel bad for this guy, but it was in his contract. That he signed. He isn't some uneducated dullard who signed things he doesn't understand. He's been in this business for decades. He signed a contract. A contract that expressly allow this to happen.
He goes on and on about how this could happen in the US. I, for one, am proud this happened because it shows contract law is still being followed no matter how "cruel" it seems to an individual. (note, his property rights aren't violated. Chrysler didn't hull off his assets; they simply no longer allow him to use Chrysler's brand and benefits).
Yes - the govn't is doing everything to crush the right to do business; And I'm as angry as the next fella. But this situation is not an example of anything except this fella didn't do proper risk management for his business.
(I hate unions about as much as anyone could hate unions. But this issue has nothing to do with anything. Who cares if Chrysler is in trouble or not. Doesn't make a different. They have the contractual right to take the franchise away. This fella agreed to it when he signed the contract. Tough shit).
He goes on and on about how this could happen in the US. I, for one, am proud this happened because it shows contract law is still being followed no matter how "cruel" it seems to an individual. (note, his property rights aren't violated. Chrysler didn't hull off his assets; they simply no longer allow him to use Chrysler's brand and benefits).
Yes - the govn't is doing everything to crush the right to do business; And I'm as angry as the next fella. But this situation is not an example of anything except this fella didn't do proper risk management for his business.
(I hate unions about as much as anyone could hate unions. But this issue has nothing to do with anything. Who cares if Chrysler is in trouble or not. Doesn't make a different. They have the contractual right to take the franchise away. This fella agreed to it when he signed the contract. Tough shit).
Quote from jprad:
The guy's dealership didn't fail, it was taken from him. For all we know, he could have been well into the black every year he was in business. Worse, his dealership could very well be handed over to one that's not as well run then his.
Now, if Chrysler was really allowed to fail then both the union and every single one of their dealerships would have been second in line to senior creditors.
But, due to government intervention, that's not what's happening.
Calling this "market darwinism" is laughable.