After commissions, what percent of trades to you need to win to make this method a positive expectancy?
Quote from sicktraderII:
42.5%
This site is intended for collaboration (entertainment in reality), so regardless of your success or demise, someone will learn something.
But let me point out a few over-shadowed key aspects to this whole journal (or three):
1) This whole effort is based on positive expectancy to begin with. With a 50% win rate
AND risk:reward ratio of 1:1.5, youâre supposed to make money. On 20 trades alone (representative of one week), you could theoretically yield $400 trading one contract (after commissions). Whether using extreme or conservative leverage, thatâs a great return for one week.
2) The money management approach is not crazy like some have pointed out. In fact, it ensures that a big string of losers doesnât sink you with big losses. It also plays well with taking on bigger size without it affecting your psych much. If you have to add endless amounts of money to your account, then you didnât have a positive expectancy after all.
The proof is in whether you can hit 50% or not.
For those who like spreadsheet analysis, I created a quick example/model of how Sicktraderâs approach could play out. Play around with the attached to better understand how money flows in and out of your account with this type of approach. Check the second worksheet out if you want to see what 260 trades (65 trading days) can look like â I even built in a max # of CARS that could be traded to keep it from going too crazy.
I have assumed that you will only add enough to keep your account at $700 should you hit a string of losses. Whether you ultimately end up with 2x or 20x result, thatâs completely dependent upon when the losses and wins come.
Thatâs luck. So, in effect, you canât guarantee your results in 65 days (even if itâs trading days). But you can surely guarantee some impressive % returns if you can hit 50% of them and add size.
Good luck regardless.
Keep trading.
JScott