To think this thread is going to be used as evidence the day thundy's undies are hanged to dry.....



Quote from PatternRec:
Just curious. Why must Evolution, big bang and religion be mutually exclusive?
Quote from Gabfly1:
Only when it comes to arrogant stupidity. Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever.
Can't quite come to terms with your own mortality, can you? And so the fairy tale lives on. By your own post, you have just revealed that your belief is based on your fear rather than anything else. Shouldn't a belief system be based on the desire for decency and fair play rather than fear? Chew on that one between trembles.Quote from reg:
Mock all you want, Gayfly. But on your dying day - when you come face to face with eternity - it will be you who will be begging for His mercy.
Quote from maxpi:
Why bundle them? I'm religious, why should I spend time kissing up to scientists so they won't think I'm stupid? Frankly I think they are full of shit up to their eyeballs. They can get away with it because they own the venue for the argument, not because their arguments are worth much. They are no different than the church of the dark ages, they are the authority, they own all the children and nobody better mess...
There is a scientific oddity that might bring some of the thinking closer between young universe and old universe. The speed of light may be slowing exponentially. Measurements of the speed of light before the Atomic Clock were done with rotating wheels of mirrors and such... those measurements, done over a few decades, within their error band, were showing that the speed of light was slowing. Once we started using the Atomic Clock the speed of light magically stabilized! The speed of the clock is slowing at the same rate as the speed of light so now "science" says that the speed of light is stable!
So the universe could be very not-old but "scientists" would not be able to see that in the context of some of their measurements...
The religion of "here by accident somehow" is very, very flawed in it's logic even, not to mention it's assumptions. A good argument has good assumptions and good logic, usually intelligent people get their logic right if nothing else but the "circular calibration" thingy is completely flawed in it's logic even! We have that shit being taught in our Universities? Huh? And it's presented as fact to our children? Fact!!
EEK, i missed the open typing this stuff.. so much idiocy so little time...
That's because you need to see the video again:Quote from Lucrum:
Probably because I haven't seen much of it.