i looked into that system as well. i haven't really tried it, but if you say it is a good indicator, but bad system, how could you change it to make it a good system?Originally posted by opmtrader
Someone mentioned earlier the Pardise Trading system at stockhits.com. I recently completed coding this system in Wealth-Lab and would like to share some of my experience with it. To explain a bit the Paradise System mainly looks for reversals indicated by various candlestick patterns. It took a while to code as there where many refinements one must make to get the pattern recognition right. Anyhow lets cut to the performance:
Testing on QQQ 1 min data for all of 2001
Before commissions and slippage the system returned $10,000 profit on a constant 800 shares of QQQ (1 emini contact)![]()
After commission and slippage the system returned a -$30,000 return during the same period
I also put the system through a number of different filters, extremely high trend values, extremely low trend values, etc. but the results were relatively the same.
While one might think that the system is completely useless based on the results I have actually been using it with some success purely as an indicator for discretionary trading. Being a pattern recognition system it basically alerts me in real time various hesitations going on in the market. I then use this input combined with S/R and other inputs to help make my decisions. While some may have a problem with this approach it works for me.
Good thread. Keep up the good work everyone.
Originally posted by opmtrader
I am sure I coded it correctly. It took me a while until I refined the criteria for the pattterns enough. They now interpret things as accurately as you would visually.
Admittedly I coded this system when the stockhits thread was in its infancy. While I had the full disclosure on the system I'm sure there are probably some refinements that have been posted that may be useful.
For those of you interested in patterns you should really look at Boop's Bar Analysis System on Wealth Lab. This guy did a fairly robust analysis of some 3 bar patterns and chose those he felt performed better than random. After testing his system on a broad index of stocks with daily data I found the results to be unimpressive.
I'm not sure what a lot of this means. Are the best known patterns all garbage? Does it depend when and where they are applied? Are there other larger factors we haven't recognized that effect the outcomes? Probably a bit of everything. I just found it interesting to find a tool that alerts me as to when a pattern that may be important to a large number of traders appears in the market. It may not be inherently meaningful but if it apparently meaningful to enough people at the same time than it may be useful.
