This isn't education in trading. If you had the skills you would have been snapped up by a bulge bracket firm. Speaking of bulge bracket firms, Goldman Sachs has 20 propriety traders, just 20!! So, please tell me what drives you to continue trading when the inevitable fact is that you will not succeed, let alone break even?
Well Halal you have struck an interesting point. I was a prop trader for bulge bracket firms for many, many years. I no longer want to keep a small % of the profits, I want to keep it all! Considering the 5% margin required for e-mini intraday, I'd rather work from home and not have to commute. Herein lies my point: You see there are very few great traders left at bulge bracket firms. Why? Because most of them have retired, like me, and are trading their own $.
With technology came an odd dilema for the 'bulge brackets'. Since no clerks, assistant traders and junior traders are necessary because of the nature of how P&L, clearance of trades, blotters, reconciliation etc. . . are all computerized - there are NO apprentice's. That's right, noone is learning the business from the last era's greats. I'm not making this up, we stuggled with this issue for years. No MBA grad from MIT wants to sit next to a big trader for 2-3 years, getting coffee for him and watching every thing he does while making no $. The only people that the 'bulge brackets' are hiring are these MBA types. They go through a training program for 6 months and then are told they are traders. They SUCK as traders only because they have no experience.
90% whatever. I see young guys on here that don't have the chance to learn the way I learned and are saying screw it. "I'll put $5000 in an account and try to learn on my own." If they succed, the LAST thing I would advise them to do is to go to a big firm and let that firm keep all the profits. A hedge fund, maybe! More power to all the young guys on here. There is only one way to learn: watch the market and learn from your mistakes.