Let us now hear from the Creationists

You always look like a loser in the debate with me.

Of course, that's not an insult....nah....no way...of course not.

Bwahahahahahaha.
__________________________

Where did I say I was skilled at debating? You know what I believe? LOL.

Once again, you are putting words (text) in other people's mouths (threads) if you make such a claim.

I have no need to claim one way or the other on this matter. Who reads chit chat and thinks: "He is a really good debater."

Not me, but if it cracks your cheeks, by all means smile, smile, smile.

__________________________
Here is a hint for you, I will make the letters really big so you can read them, so if you get confused again, you can refer back to this post:











CHIT CHAT IS NOT THE REAL WORLD.



So go ahead, keep practicing your "real world $300.00 per hour opinion generating stuff."

Quote from kjkent1:

When you declared your deceitful intent, the bet ended. In any case, I didn't insult you. I just said that you always look like a loser in the debate to me. That's because you never present any facts to support your positions.

I think it's rather sad that you believe that you are skilled at debating. There's no judge or panel here, so you can work your circular reasoning. But I know, and what's more YOU know, that the shit you sling wouldn't hold up in the real world.

Whereas, I've had practice making sure that my argument is supported by facts, so I know my shit will hold up.

Anyway, you have a great weekend.
 
Quote from hank rollins:

you have become quite the true believer. pray tell, what does witchcraft, alchemy, astrology, numerology, et al teach us about the begining of time?

zzzz has cleaned your clock, go back to your cubicle.

:D :p

peace out

Just for you, we will add aztec, egyptian, hawaiian, greek and norse versions of creation to the biology course.

As for your opinion that Z has has cleaned my clock, well, maybe so, but he still needs to clean my toilets and pull weeds if he wants to get paid.

You may help him if you need the money. I can probably spare a pair of old tennis shoes and coat, too.
 
Quote from kjkent1:

Just for you, we will add aztec, egyptian, hawaiian, greek and norse versions of creation to the biology course.

As for your opinion that Z has has cleaned my clock, well, maybe so, but he still needs to clean my toilets and pull weeds if he wants to get paid.

You may help him if you need the money. I can probably spare a pair of old tennis shoes and coat, too.


LOL ! you really have no clue. perhaps Zzzzzz lives in a $14 mill manse overlooking the pacific in southern CA....



your inability to answer the initial question posed and avoidance of same is indicative of your faulty thought process.


the above beliefs all have a common thread--- the thread of a CREATION. no need to teach specifics, since specifics are unknown at this time, stop avoiding the underlying theme of a CREATOR by mixing diverse cultural, demographic interpretations of same.


hank :p :D :p
 
Quote from hank rollins:



the above beliefs all have a common thread--- the thread of a CREATION. no need to teach specifics, since specifics are unknown at this time, stop avoiding the underlying theme of a CREATOR by mixing diverse cultural, demographic interpretations of same.


hank :p :D :p

Yeah, Kent, whats'amatterwithyou?! Just teach CREATION... no need for proof or "specifics" because there isn't any. ROFLMAO!!
 
Quote from hank rollins:

LOL ! you really have no clue. perhaps Zzzzzz lives in a $14 mill manse overlooking the pacific in southern CA....



your inability to answer the initial question posed and avoidance of same is indicative of your faulty thought process.


the above beliefs all have a common thread--- the thread of a CREATION. no need to teach specifics, since specifics are unknown at this time, stop avoiding the underlying theme of a CREATOR by mixing diverse cultural, demographic interpretations of same.


hank :p :D :p

F#13#11 = C7#9b5
 
Oh STU -- did you wince in pain and embarrassment when you read the previous quote on this thread. Mr. -- "Creator" in the declaration of idependance could mean quantum flux and Jefferson was a deist at best.


03-03-05 06:02 AM

From your link to Jefferson's writings:

THE MORALS OF JESUS
To Dr. Benjamin Rush, with a Syllabus
Washington, Apr. 21, 1803

DEAR SIR, -- In some of the delightful conversations with you, in the evenings of 1798-99, and which served as an anodyne to the afflictions of the crisis through which our country was then laboring, the Christian religion was sometimes our topic; and I then promised you, that one day or other, would give you my views of it. They are the result of a life of inquiry & reflection, and very different from that anti-Christian system imputed to me by those who know nothing ofmy opinions. To the corruptions of Christianity I am indeed opposed; but not to the genuine precepts of Jesus himself. I am a Christian, in the only sense he wished any one to be; sincerely attached to his doctrines, in preference to all others; ascribing to himself every human excellence; & believing he never claimed any other. At the short intervals since these
 
Quote from kjkent1:

Now, come on. It's just a coincidence that all EC's quotes are found on one page on line. He actually has all the individual books, and he researched his response and typed all the quotes in to make his point, and he did it all in about 15 minutes.

I already apologized for suggesting that he be held in contempt. I'm sure that a judge would agree.

Don't cha think?

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/A...9/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/103-4425777-4431010

page 58 look it up....and yes i did take my time to copy it from the book....crazy i tell ya...crazyyyyyyyyy.....
 
Quote from jem:

Oh STU -- did you wince in pain and embarrassment when you read the previous quote on this thread. Mr. -- "Creator" in the declaration of idependance could mean quantum flux and Jefferson was a deist at best.


03-03-05 06:02 AM

From your link to Jefferson's writings:

THE MORALS OF JESUS
To Dr. Benjamin Rush, with a Syllabus
Washington, Apr. 21, 1803

DEAR SIR, -- In some of the delightful conversations with you, in the evenings of 1798-99, and which served as an anodyne to the afflictions of the crisis through which our country was then laboring, the Christian religion was sometimes our topic; and I then promised you, that one day or other, would give you my views of it. They are the result of a life of inquiry & reflection, and very different from that anti-Christian system imputed to me by those who know nothing ofmy opinions. To the corruptions of Christianity I am indeed opposed; but not to the genuine precepts of Jesus himself. I am a Christian, in the only sense he wished any one to be; sincerely attached to his doctrines, in preference to all others; ascribing to himself every human excellence; & believing he never claimed any other. At the short intervals since these
Uh JEM -- No. Why would I?

Thomas Jefferson's letter to William Short August 4 1820 explaining his reasons for the letter and Syllabus to Dr Rush...

My aim in that was, to justify the character of Jesus against the fictions of his pseudo-followers, which have exposed him to the inference of being an impostor. For if we could believe that he really countenanced the follies, the falsehoods and the charlatanisms which his biographers father on him, and admit the misconstructions, interpolations and theorizations of the fathers of the early, and fanatics of the latter ages, the conclusion would be irresistible by every sound mind, that he was an impostor. I give no credit to their falsifications of his actions and doctrines, and to rescue his character, the postulate in my letter asked only what is granted in reading every other historian.... That Jesus did not mean to impose himself on mankind as the son of God, physically speaking, I have been convinced by the writings of men more learned than myself in that lore.

Get over it JEM. You are here for a brief period by no other better reason than a quantum fart in a vacuum
 
Back
Top