Let me tell you a little bit about Ron Paul

if anyone wants it, i paged back and saved the first page of the deleted rp thread

i'm sure there's a simple explanation. dunno about anyone else but this is at least the fourth time i've seen a good thread dissapear in the last few months. one was anti-fed at the outset of the credit contagion on a really bad down day, another was a uk independent piece by robert fisk on the official 911 story, third one was an NPR marketplace researcher soliciting reasons for high oil prices
 
Quote from Avid_Consumer:

if anyone wants it, i paged back and saved the first page of the deleted rp thread

i'm sure there's a simple explanation. dunno about anyone else but this is at least the fourth time i've seen a good thread dissapear in the last few months. one was anti-fed at the outset of the credit contagion on a really bad down day, another was a uk independent piece by robert fisk on the official 911 story, third one was an NPR marketplace researcher soliciting reasons for high oil prices
More...

There is an element of censorship here at ET. That is for sure.
 
Quote from Hydroblunt:

You're a moron who has reading comprehension issues. I have already posted the entire transcript. Where did Larry say he made the decision? At most he said that the fire chief & he decided to "pull it". Yet he also said the fire chief told him it had to be done. Is he gonna fight the fire chief's decision, no, he will just concede, he does not care.
More...
Oh, I see now. The fire chief is in on the CIA/Mossad conspiracy but instead of blowing the building up he discusses it with private citizen Silverstein. Cause that's what government conspirators always do, they spill their guts to Larry Silverstein, don't they.

Silverstein (being a life-long developer and a billionaire) is dumb enough to ask questions about the explosives in the building and dumb enough to keep his mouth shut during the interview. Having secured Silverstein's approval, the conspirators bring down the building via controlled demolition... because they don't want it to look like controlled demolition, they want it to look like the result of the terror attack.

LOL, what a ridiculous theory, it makes even less sense than the nonsense about Silverstein being in on it that Ratboy has been spewing for years. Try again detective.
 
Quote from Hydroblunt:

You're a moron who has reading comprehension issues. I have already posted the entire transcript. Where did Larry say he made the decision? At most he said that the fire chief & he decided to "pull it". Yet he also said the fire chief told him it had to be done. Is he gonna fight the fire chief's decision, no, he will just concede, he does not care.

Have you ever worked at a corporation where embezzlment & fraud occur? You think everyone is on the scam? No, it relies on idiots like you who just follow orders and never question ambiguities & irrational decisions. When someone smart enough raises concerns, they get shut out & fired or forced to resign. Everyone else just stands by with dumbfounded looks on their face. For every Enron, there are dozens of operations that never get caught, just smoothed over and blamed on smth else.

It's no different in this case, it's not even a conspiracy. It's a calculated event that relies on dumbed down sheep. And you, along with the millions just like you, are the perfect signs of its success.

If you honestly are dumb enough to believe that falling debris started a fire in WTC that brought it down in such a uniform manner, then I suggest starting a demolition company because that sounds a lot cheaper than wiring a building for weeks with explosives. In fact, I'm surprised noone has ever figured that out before.
Sounds like the real conspiracy are the demolition experts, who the f**k needs them. Just start a fire on one of the floors and the building will flatten itself out.
More...


dddooo is a Canadian AIPAC disinformation agent.

I can send you the dossier I have compiled on him.
 
Quote from dddooo:

Oh, I see now. The fire chief is in on the CIA/Mossad conspiracy but instead of blowing the building up he discusses it with private citizen Silverstein. Cause that's what government conspirators always do, they spill their guts to Larry Silverstein, don't they.
More...

Who says that even the Fire Chief is in on it? How do you know he is not just following orders? What if he is relying on someone else's expertise and then just putting his seal of approval on it? What if the order came from above? Is he going to question it? History & studies tell us 80-90% of people would not.

What is Larry Silverstein supposed to do? Why would he question anything the fire chief tells him? Two of his buildings just collapsed and the third is on fire. The chief calls him and tells him that they gotta "pull it". Anyone's reaction at that time & place would be "Do what you gotta do". That's it.

I don't even know why I am replying to you, I guess it's comical & interesting to me just how your argument keeps degenerating and how your brain is unable to accept certain concepts.
A look at Iran/Contra shows exactly how schemes like this are pulled off. Congress was faced with information from the start, almost all of them just stuck their head in the sand on instinct. It has been conditioned in today's society.
 
Quote from TheDudeofLife:

dddooo is a Canadian AIPAC disinformation agent.

I can send you the dossier I have compiled on him.
More...

What's the requirement for such a job, IQ below 85?
 
Quote from Hydroblunt:
More...



Who says that even the Fire Chief is in on it? How do you know he is not just following orders?
Oh I see, the Fire Chief is NOT in on a huge extremely secretive government conspiracy to kill thousands of americans but they order him of all people to demolish the building, moreover he is allowed to call Silverstein on an unsecured line and discuss it. Please, please tell me what you're smoking.

Is he going to question it? History & studies tell us 80-90% of people would not.
OMG, the conspirators are killing thousands of americans, they just killed 400 fire fighters and they employ the fire chief (which is totally unnecessary) hoping that he won't tell on them. I can't believe anyone could come up with this kind of nonsense.

The chief calls him and tells him that they gotta "pull it". Anyone's reaction at that time & place would be "Do what you gotta do". That's it.
LOL, now you're trying to rewrite the history. Here is the original quote:

Silverstein: "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

See dummy, Silverstein told them to "pull it" not the other way around as you just lied. The whole conspiracy revolves around this one fact. Nice try, no cigar.
 
Quote from ratboy88:

NO WAY !!!!

huckxmas.jpg
More...

so doodoo... is Huckleberry still your uber candidate? you rawk doodoo... talk about pickin a winner. LMAOOOOOOOOO
 
Quote from ratboy88:

so doodoo... is Huckleberry still your uber candidate? you rawk doodoo... talk about pickin a winner. LMAOOOOOOOOO
More...
LOL, he is not my candidate, I anticipated his rise when he was at the very bottom where Ron Paul is today but Huck is not my guy, I rarely vote republican to begin with and I could not care less whether it's going to be Huck, Romney, Rudy or even McCain.

Nevertheless as far as Huckabee and my winner picking abilities are concerned - he lost over 100 pounds over the course of a year (leftmost image), he has double-digit lead in Iowa and is leading in some national polls.

12/13/2007
Giuliani 19%
Huckabee 23%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...2/daily_presidential_tracking_polling_history



He did a great job losing weight (yeah, that's him on the left), I did great predicting his rise. You should be proud too though, your guy Paul is ahead of Alan Keys.

huckabee_fat.jpg


More importantly though, Hydroblunt has completely destroyed your conspiracy theory that Silverstein was in on it. What do you think about that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top