Quote from Haroki:
Oh, you've (notice the contraction THAT time?) got your panties in a bunch over that, eh?
Again, also a demonstrable trait in RP supporters. They're so dumb they can't even think up their own insults.
LMAO....
Quote from Haroki:
its'
Quote from Maverick74:
Let me ask you a few honest questions. The first, whatever you believe the motive was for the Bush administration to take down the WTC, could they not have accomplished their objective any other way? And if they could have, why didn't they?
Next question. Who was responsible for the 1993 WTC bombing?
And finally. Do you believe Ron Paul was involved in the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995?
Quote from Avid_Consumer:
as i'm sure you're familiar, the pnac from which bush recruited a large part of his cabinet said themselves, "the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor."
Quote from Haroki:
Must be tough, fighting for space at the trough with all the other sheep that believe this line of reasoning as a primer for 9/11 being "an inside job".
PNAC was talking about changing the military ONLY. They were of the opinion that in order for the US military to stay at the forefront, they needed to start incorporating improvements in information technology.
That document was what, 90 pages? And to take 1 paragraph and say that this represents the message of the entire thing is absolutely beyond stupidity.
Quote from dddooo:
My common sense tells me that private citizen Silverstein would not be involved in a huge [CIA/Mossad] conspiracy, he would definitely not be in charge ordering to blow buildings up and then giving interviews about it.
Quote from Avid_Consumer:
PNAC goes far beyond that. as an organization they advocated re-establishing american hegemony accross the world by replacing problem regimes with american style democracy. rebuilding america's defenses was one part of that, but also a part that illustrated a certain degree of fervor for their goal, envisioning catastrophe as a catalyzing event
Quote from Avid_Consumer:
is it also true that US forces were amassed on the afghan border just days before 911 and we were telling foreign governments in June 2001? i hadn't heard that one before, just stumbled on it. there is obviously much more detail to the 911 story than the officially propagated one...
Quote from Hydroblunt:
You have no common sense, just a pre-determined outlook. Noone said Silverstein had to be a part of anything, in fact, he never gave the order. Nowhere in his interview did he say he gave the order, in fact, it was never his decision nor expertise, he simply conceded with what the fire chief told him should be done, why wouldn't he anyway.
Hence his slip-up, he was never told anything short of what the fire department chief told him. Nor does he care, cause he gets to collect insurance money anyway, something he has been fighting about, cause all he really wants is his money. He does not give a sh*t about who did 9/11 or why.
But thanks for showing exactly why your opinion & argument has no value. Here is a clue, if you want your argument to have a basis, you are better off arguing what "pull the building" and "pull it" mean. I'll concede this much, 9/11 is full of very unique events, spanning from physics to use of industry specific language. And it's just a coincidence that every other major world changing event, such as Gulf of Tonkin, Iran/Contra Wars, Pearl Harbor, Reichstag Fire & RMS Lusitania Sinking are full of unique ambiguities as well.
Can I quote you on that? Cause your fellow Conspiracy theorists built their entire case on one single fact that Larry Silverstein said in an interview that he had decided to "pull it" and that could only mean demolishing the building. Now you're stabbing your friends in the back by destroying their best and only argument and claiming that Silverstein was not even in the loop. Ratboy will be especially upset, he's been talking about Larry Silverstein's involvement in the demolition of TWC 7 for the last 5 years. Are you trying to destroy his life's work? Shame on you.Quote from Hydroblunt:
Noone said Silverstein had to be a part of anything, in fact, he never gave the order. Nowhere in his interview did he say he gave the order, in fact, it was never his decision nor expertise.
Hence his slip-up, he was never told anything short of what the fire department chief told him. Nor does he care, cause he gets to collect insurance money anyway, something he has been fighting about, cause all he really wants is his money. He does not give a sh*t about who did 9/11 or why.