Let me tell you a little bit about Ron Paul
- Thread starter Maverick74
- Start date
hey, i was wrong and i can gracefully admit it. i misread your use of it as a garden variety grammatical error
if you on the other hand feel comfortable projecting that into me being a stupid redneck, blasting out the names, and further generalizing that to all ron paul supporters... maybe, just maybe, this exchange says something about your true level of education and maturity
just sayin
generalization is not usually a mark of intelligence
if you on the other hand feel comfortable projecting that into me being a stupid redneck, blasting out the names, and further generalizing that to all ron paul supporters... maybe, just maybe, this exchange says something about your true level of education and maturity
just sayin
generalization is not usually a mark of intelligence
Or perhaps it points to your level of arrogance, eh? Take this exchange as a wake-up call regarding that.
I mean really, not recognizing its' use as a contraction?
I think your zealotry to defend other RP supporters clouded your judgement. Get a hold on reality, dude.....
The generalization that a certain %age of RP supporters are uneducated seemed to be confirmed there for a while, huh?
if you were to read my posts on paul, you'd see that i'm not a zealot... i freely admit that he's not ideal as a candidate but that he represents certain ideals which other candidates won't likely address.
i admit to busting out the arrogance .. in response to blatant arrogance... when you come out generalizing all ron paul supporters, you give up the ability to make that argument
lol and just so we both know where we stand on this grammar issue, your use of its as its' above is incorrect
does that make you a 'redneck cumstain'? by your definition, yes, it does.
It's actually easy to measure, conspiracy theorists were in fact successful in cracking the 9/11 plot and figuring out that it was an inside job. That was an amazing piece of detective work as it was based on one single fact that Larry Silverstein said "pull it" and they figured out the rest.
But that's only one case, they still have no idea that the attack on the WTC in 1993, the Marine Baracks bombing in Beirut, Lockerbie, african embassies, the USS Cole, bombings in Madrid, London, Moscow, Bali and India were all carried out by the CIA and Mossad.
They also don't know that it's not sunnis and shia killing each other in Iraq, in fact it's the Zionists blowing up mosques and civilians over there. And they don't even suspect that the riots in Paris and anti-cartoon riots all over the world were organized by the CIA and Mossad as well.
You got us on 9/11, I guess blaming it on Saudi nationals in order to invade Afghanistan and Iraq did not fool these incredibly shrewd CTers. But there is so much more they still don't know.
so by your logic an event can't be a conspiracy unless all related events are also conspiracies?
It actually appears that there is, in fact, a bigger douchebag than Hapaboy making the rounds on Elitetrader. Haroki is the winner.
Check your facts Mr. Government man, IRS collects income tax for payments to federal reserve, not one cent goes to running the country
other taxes actually run the country
but how would you know that, your job is to show up on any 9/11 thread or any change the government thread and do your character assassination and spit pseudo facts
How are things going at the AIPAC ?
