Still can't post a link, more flippant one line posts.
What a shameless weasel.
WeaselsOut is your new nick.
Let it Rip - Don't argue with anti-vaxx, snakeoil peddling MAGAtards
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
Still can't post a link, more flippant one line posts.
What a shameless weasel.
WeaselsOut is your new nick.
American Journal of Therapeutics:
Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review,
Conclusions:
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.
https://journals.lww.com/americanth...mectin_for_prevention_and_treatment_of.7.aspx
Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review,
Conclusions:
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.
https://journals.lww.com/americanth...mectin_for_prevention_and_treatment_of.7.aspx
So once again a "Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death" -- which includes studies that were withdrawn for being fraudulent including the Shouman study in Egypt. This study is just more of the same Ivermectin pusher nonsense.
Can you let us know what qualifies as mainstream? Would any one that published one of the peer reviewed papers be immediately disqualified?
First you said none were peer reviewed.
You realize that’s 100% wrong like virtually everything you post about Covid?
LOLLLLLLL
Here is a peer reviewed study from a ‘mainstream’ journal.
Not good enough.
Losers. Anti-science losers.
A total of 229 health personnel were recruited for thisstudy; 98 within the control (PPE alone) group and 131 received IVECAR treatment in addition to theirwearing of PPE.
Were you always dumb or eating horse paste accelerated that issue? Vaccine trials had nearly 30000 participants and you deem them unsafe but a trial of 130 people is 'peer reviewed'? Not to mention its not even a pure IVM study, its a combination study.
Well done, dumbfuck
Can’t you read moron?
We conclude that by using ivermectin in oral solution and carrageenan in nasal spray form, we are providing an inexpensive, safe and effective means to protect people from contagion and serious forms of the disease.
So which one worked? Ivermectin or carrageenan?
And considering that 98% of the people do not get serious forms of the disease, how can one conclude that based on a 130 people study?
Try to think before posting gibberish, this ain't your local facebook group where big words and insults will get you by.