So what. A couple thousand Americans might die of swine flu and you want to militarize the Country for that?
Get some perspective.
Leon Panetta is prepping us for war with Iran
- Thread starter Max E.
- Start date
So what. A couple thousand Americans might die of swine flu and you want to militarize the Country for that?
Get some perspective.
Quote from achilles28:
^ Exactly.
All this talk of the United States being legitimately threatened by men in caves, and Mullahs in a third world country, is abject paranoia.
From what I've heard, the US Military is about 4 GENERATIONS AHEAD the nearest rival, with an annual budget that eclipses the world, over!
There is no outside threat that can touch America. NONE. Maybe a rouge nuke or dirty bomb gets through, and that Country is toast. That's it.
The real threat is the one inside the Country: the constant push for total war from the war-mongering Right (and Left); the refusal to close down non-detectable entry points into the Country (the border); and the all-out assault against the Constitution to militarize the Reichland in the name of fighting Emmanuel Goldstein, who he, and his leadership, are long since dead.
But take heart! So long as we continue to stir-up shit around the globe and bomb wedding parties instead of terrorists, new "Al Queda" like groups - like the new, shadowy "Haquani Network" in Pakistan - will pop up and we can justify perpetual war forever ! Long live the brave struggle against Eurasia!
Look closely! There's a resemblance!
+1 or 2
The whole paranoid idea of the U.S. being in fear of a bunch of thugs and 3rd world never-do-wells has always intrigued me. In reality, the bastards did actually win, we have lost our fun of flying, we actually had color coded fear numbers. One of the other threads mentioned something about
democrat=lie
typical of lucrum or whatever, the child who just types in grade school name calling.
Lies? You want to talk about lies? We, as a nation, are still reeling from the lies from Bush and his comrades. What a joke, if it didn't kill so many American kids, and ruin our name in the rest of the world.
Nice to see some actual somber discussions. These children really get to me with their biased name calling. Almost as bad as that poor kid, mucho grande or whatever, sending posts to himself for some kind of support. Man, hard to find anyone on here any longer who actually has a brain. Thanks for giving me some hope.
c
He voted for the authorization to use military force to invade Afghanistan and take out the Taliban. USM higher-ups allowed Bin Laden to "slip away" in Tora Bora, where he was surrounded. Paul wouldn't have let that happen. Nor would Paul have allowed the "airlift of evil" that saw thousands of top Al Queda and Taliban escape into Pakistan.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airlift_of_Evil
As far as cleaning up the stragglers, Ron supports judicious use of Letters of Marque and Reappraisal - essentially a Constitutionally-sanctioned targeted hit against specific belligerents, with a reward. In todays world, it would imply contracting a Black Water XE or foreign agents to kill/capture named enemies for a couple billion. Imagine the money and lives that could have been saved if that approach was taken? But, of course, that wasn't the point....
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YSP9NteApqI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
How did you manage to make posts then?
I read somewhere that they do NOT have a constitution.
So, are they applying religious law based on Torah/Talmud/etc?
1. Where is the constitution? Is it the torah/talmud/etc?
2. "We are already built": He did not credit the american money/expertise/knowledge/etc that great america and great americans gave them as aid. Where is the thank you?
Well, let's see. An attempt to discuss or just plain not someone who understands english well. If there is no change, as you say, then I guess we still have the Bush doctrines in place. Hmm, troops out of Iraq vs. invading Iraq. Actually got Osama vs. spending zillions for nothing. I could go on, but don't want to get you tied up too long.
And, you're concerned that I type my first initial in my posts. I guess that's better than name calling. Maybe your therapy is working. Too bad to see young children in therapy.
c
??
Obama is Bush II. Any perceived real "change" is an illusion of Odumbo's sheeple so they don't have to face the reality that they fucked up supporting him.
What would the narcissistic need of a haughty arrogant condescending jack ass to put a repetitious unnecessary initial at the end of each post, have to do with name calling?