Left wing Hero Michael Avenatti Arrested for beating his wife.

[Max E.]

"She hit me first".
-Guilty.

Exactly...... i dont give a shit what a woman does to you, if your a real man you should be able to restrain her in a way that doesnt involve the woman getting two black eyes, no matter what shes doing......

Although i guess if she comes at you with a knife all bets are off, then you can cold cock the bitch

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

All women must be believed.

She seems very credible.

Hang the motherchucker. He had friends who drank beer in college.

 

[Tsing Tao]

https://www.thedailybeast.com/tmz-g...evins-gossip-empire-became-trumps-best-friend

Of course you're skeptical. He's your guy.

Instead of applying all accusations equally, you apply them through partisan eyes.

 

[Cuddles]

Of course you're skeptical. He's your guy.

Instead of applying all accusations equally, you apply them through partisan eyes.

Yeah, no. Just like Kavanaugh, do a real investigation and bury the guy if guilty. You on the other hand are "liking" fake news. Wife literally said she hasn't seen Avenatti in months. TMZ is already retracting parts of the story. There's no doubt a woman involved, we'll see if she sticks to her story like Blasey did.

Just remember, they pulled the same stunt on Stormy and now there's a few cops collecting unemployment for it.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Yeah, no. Just like Kavanaugh, do a real investigation and bury the guy if guilty

Completely agree. Except Kavanaugh was essentially ruined without being determined to be guilty, and if democrats had their way, no investigation of any credibility would have been done.

All I'm noting is your eagerness to jump on Kavanaugh the moment an accusation was put forth (you have dozens of posts on this forum ready to burn the guy at the stake) and your similar zeal to instantly cast doubt on Avenatti's accusers without having any knowledge of the accusations, merely because the guy is a hero to the left.

Most of us see that as hypocritical.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Yeah, no. Just like Kavanaugh, do a real investigation and bury the guy if guilty

Ahhh no. Not like Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh had not been charged with any crime whatsoever by a law enforcement agency, and Avenatti has. That is true even if he is not guilty.
Your ilk turned a confirmation hearing into a criminal trial with no charges having been filed such that he could defend himself.

 

[Cuddles]

Completely agree. Except Kavanaugh was essentially ruined without being determined to be guilty, and if democrats had their way, no investigation of any credibility would have been done.

All I'm noting is your eagerness to jump on Kavanaugh the moment an accusation was put forth (you have dozens of posts on this forum ready to burn the guy at the stake) and your similar zeal to instantly cast doubt on Avenatti's accusers without having any knowledge of the accusations, merely because the guy is a hero to the left.

Most of us see that as hypocritical.

What's hypocritical? All I did was ask for an investigation before he was confirmed, the stakes are too high not to. It'd be near impossible to oust the guy once confirmed and he could've done damage while at the bench already. You can choose to believe the FBI was thorough.... I'll wait on the house hearings once the FBI director is dragged in to confirm so.

I'll believe the LAPD once formal charges are brought even if they're tweeting about how they arrested Avenatti

 

[smallfil]

The left will always group a race or gender, especially white male, and attack them. They are the divisive one.

https://www.reddit.com/r/path%3D%252Fr%252FThe_Donald%252Fcomments%252F9x5ebr%252F

We will certainly, be hearing from his ex-wife. What will the Me Too movement say if he is convicted? Funny, none of them are even condemning this guy? Why? They had no problem attacking Judge Brett Kavanaugh on mere accusations without proof?

 

[Tsing Tao]

What's hypocritical? All I did was ask for an investigation before he was confirmed, the stakes are too high not to. It'd be near impossible to oust the guy once confirmed and he could've done damage while at the bench already. You can choose to believe the FBI was thorough.... I'll wait on the house hearings once the FBI director is dragged in to confirm so.

Oh, please. Are you this much in denial? Your posts were all tainted with indications that you believed Kavanaugh guilty. Even now, you're hinting that the FBI's investigation wasn't acceptable. Yet every post about Avenatti in this thread has you claiming skepticism without any knowledge of the incident at all.

I should be clear, Avenatti should get a fair investigation and not be considered guilty just like Kavanaugh should have gotten. But he didn't, and mainly because Avenatti was pushing the accusations (false ones, as we've found out). Even so, I'm applying my standards equally and saying the guy should get a fair shake.

You aren't.

 

[Cuddles]

Oh, please. Are you this much in denial? Your posts were all tainted with indications that you believed Kavanaugh guilty. Even now, you're hinting that the FBI's investigation wasn't acceptable. Yet every post about Avenatti in this thread has you claiming skepticism without any knowledge of the incident at all.

I should be clear, Avenatti should get a fair investigation and not be considered guilty just like Kavanaugh should have gotten. But he didn't, and mainly because Avenatti was pushing the accusations (false ones, as we've found out). Even so, I'm applying my standards equally and saying the guy should get a fair shake.

You aren't.

Oh, was kavanaugh dragged in for questioning by the authorities? Did the FBI question him? Did the WH not direct the so called investigation? And I'm the one in denial?