Yeh. keep posting the same thing as if it counters what I said or supports it.
I argued that the women have a vested interest in seeing him remain as an income producer so they stuck up for him. Then you post something that shows that he owes one of them 150,000 a month and the link in the first post says he owes 1.9 million in back child and spousal support.
Might want to give it a rest mate. You are looking less-than-smart.
I'm not the one saying he was ordered to pay up. Nice back pedal though
