Quote from gnome:
1. Short of a Second Revolution, that's our only hope. However the American electorate is too naive to realize such a need. (Besides, most are interested only in their own personal "gummint cheese" in the short term.)
2. Watchdogging? HA! They'd just tell us to "Go F*CK yourselves"... just like they did when they trash-canned the Gramm, Rudman, Hollings LAW in 1987.
After the 2000 election, the question was asked from Europe, "Why would you folks spend $4 Billion on the election?". The answer, of course, is "BECAUSE IT'S WORTH IT!"...
I'm sure everyone can connect THOSE dots...
Quote from da-net:
In a movie "Brewster's Millions" it was promoted to write in vote for "None of the Above" in an election. If we (everyone that views the choices as no choice) were to write in vote for "None of the Above" this would create a problem for the electorial representatives, especially if "None of the Above" recieved more votes than any candidate..
Quote from Hydroblunt:
And why put in "None of the above" when you can vote Ron Paul.
However, your idea needs to be transformed to truly be effective. The real power of today's world is media & finance. If stop letting those have control over you, that's when the establishment will get scared. It's Ghandi's approach, but for the modern times.
Quote from da-net:
One local man has been extremely successful in magistrate court litigation on malfeasance charges against local government county & state politicans & employees. He has taken $15k out of many of their pockets which I believe they notice. On charges of malfeasance they do not qualify for government paid legal representation.
Quote from gnome:
1. Short of a Second Revolution, that's our only hope.