Lawyers For The DNC Argue That Primary Rigging Is Protected By The First Amendment

[Banjo]

"The ongoing litigation of the DNC Fraud Lawsuit and the appeal regarding its dismissal took a stunning turn yesterday. The defendants in the case, including the DNC and former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, filed a response brief that left many observers of the case at a loss for words."

https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/0...-rigging-is-protected-by-the-first-amendment/

 

[exGOPer]

Classic fake news by right wing troll factory, no link provided for the brief to see the context of the remarks and their standard operating procedure

It appears that the defendants in the DNC

It seems here that the DNC is arguing

Anything can appear or seem like anything if you don't provide the source and write a story based on an agenda.

FAKE NEWS

 

[Cuddles]

Google citizens United

 

[Wallet]

Classic fake news by right wing troll factory, no link provided for the brief to see the context of the remarks and their standard operating procedure

It appears that the defendants in the DNC

It seems here that the DNC is arguing

Anything can appear or seem like anything if you don't provide the source and write a story based on an agenda.

FAKE NEWS

Yes the link was there, it was that little red lettered word - document.

http://jampac.us/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2-20-18-Ds-Response-Brief.pdf

 

[gwb-trading]

Yes the link was there, it was that little red lettered word - document.

http://jampac.us/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2-20-18-Ds-Response-Brief.pdf

Once again, exGOPer NEVER reads the articles. NEVER finds or reads the links. He just continually pushes his "classic fake news / right wing troll factory" assertions attempting to discredit the source without ever reading the material.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Once again, exGOPer NEVER reads the articles. NEVER finds or reads the links. He just continually pushes his "classic fake news / right wing troll factory" assertions attempting to discredit the source without ever reading the material.

What do you want, dude? He's paid to do precisely that.

 

[exGOPer]

Once again, exGOPer NEVER reads the articles. NEVER finds or reads the links. He just continually pushes his "classic fake news / right wing troll factory" assertions attempting to discredit the source without ever reading the material.

This is hilarious coming from a documented liar who made absurd and false claims about 30% Dem margin without any source to back it up, when asked he refers to 'articles' that didn't have the data.

Save me your fake concern trolling.

 

[exGOPer]

Yes the link was there, it was that little red lettered word - document.

http://jampac.us/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2-20-18-Ds-Response-Brief.pdf

I read the brief, the 'first amendment' part was about the accuser's claims, not the 'rigging' part, which is why the right winger had to add 'it seems' 'it appears' to make his BS case. DNC never conducted the elections so the whole question of rigging the election is absurd.

 

[Wallet]

I read the brief, the 'first amendment' part was about the accuser's claims, not the 'rigging' part, which is why the right winger had to add 'it seems' 'it appears' to make his BS case. DNC never conducted the elections so the whole question of rigging the election is absurd.

To be clear, Defendants deny all allegations that they favored or were biased toward or against any candidate in the course of the 2016 presidential primary, but even accepting Plaintiffs’ allegations at face value as is appropriate at the motion to dismiss stage, the continued maintenance of this action threatens serious injury to the DNC’s—and to all political parties’—well-established First Amendment rights.

The DNC doesn't conduct elections they just pick select the Candidate. Which is what the suit is about.

Try again. This time you might try actually reading it.

 

[Cuddles]

To be clear, Defendants deny all allegations that they favored or were biased toward or against any candidate in the course of the 2016 presidential primary, but even accepting Plaintiffs’ allegations at face value as is appropriate at the motion to dismiss stage, the continued maintenance of this action threatens serious injury to the DNC’s—and to all political parties’—well-established First Amendment rights.

The DNC doesn't conduct elections they just pick select the Candidate. Which is what the suit is about.

Try again. This time you might try actually reading it.

So they're saying they favored the candidate most likely to win? Whoa, somebody stop the presses, the RNC always favored Trump to be their man.