[...
Wow! you are a dumbass.I watch you get smacked so often and on a regular basis, and then you just keep coming back for more. It’s incredible really. There is toughness to true stupidity that I think is underappreciated. It’s fascinating.
I watch you get smacked so often and on a regular basis, and then you just keep coming back for more. It’s incredible really. There is toughness to true stupidity that I think is underappreciated. It’s fascinating.
So, the answer to my questions so far is they don't fucking know and the biodistribution of the vaccine is throughout the body which is incredibly alarming.Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech
https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...nt-report-for-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine
Pharmacokinetic studies have not been conducted with COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 and are generally not considered necessary to support the development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005; WHO, 2014).
Toxicity conclusions
The absence of reproductive toxicity data is a reflection of the speed of development to first identify and select COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 for clinical testing and its rapid development to meet the ongoing urgent health need. In principle, a decision on licensing a vaccine could be taken in these circumstances without data from reproductive toxicity studies animals, but there are studies ongoing and these will be provided when available. In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated. These judgements reflect the absence of data at the present time and do not reflect a specific finding of concern. Adequate advice with regard to women of childbearing potential, pregnant women and breastfeeding women has been provided in both the Information for UK Healthcare Professionals and the Information for UK recipients.
You didn't read it.Yes... which is why follow-up studies are being done for pregnant women. So far the results show no significant issues.
You didn't read it.
The answer to my questions is that they don't know and/or it is distributed throughout the body which would explain inflammation in the heart.
Pharmacokinetic studies have not been conducted with COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 and are generally not considered necessary to support the development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005; WHO, 2014).
Adequate advice with regard to women of childbearing potential,
That is the results from the test on rats that is referenced on the webpage.
Until I am confident that the below is not a problem, I am not taking the vaccine. Period.
If it is a problem, oh shit.
![]()
I AM NOT PUSHING ANYTHING! I AM NOT ATTEMPTING TO MAKE AN ARGUMENT!!!!!!!So you are pushing the Japanese study and chart which has been pushed by anti-vaxxers as they make many false claims about biodistribution and the COVID vaccines. Even the Japanese regulators stated the study & this chart shows there are no issues with the vaccines. The article I posted early on this thread today discusses the mis-interpretation by anti-vaxxers of the Japanese information in detail.
All you are doing is re-posting a pile of anti-vaxxer CRUD --- all of it has already been debunked as complete nonsense.
Wow! you are a dumbass.
I am not attempting to make an argument. I am simply asking questions.
Learn the difference fucking retard.
Your stupidity is extremely annoying.