A valid question, to be sure. But it is interesting that there is so such controversy or concern thus far, to my knowledge, in connection with the mRNA vaccines.
Yes, everything should be looked at for every vaccine.
There is a lot of heavy duty statistical analysis that must hold up under scrutiny too. It is not just a matter of occurrences among vaccine takers versus general pop background data but also the time distribution of the occurences, etc. For example, one might argue that xyz vaccine generated 8 blood clot cases compared to a background rate of 8 and in the general unvaccinated pop so everything is groovy. Not necessarily. What time frames we looking at? If that is 8 per year in the general pop thoughout the year compared to 8 that suspiciously occurred within ten days of receiving a certain vaccine, well then Houston we got a problem we need to look at.