Latest Numbers

<iframe src='http://charts.realclearpolitics.com/1044.epoll.html' width='100%' height='547' frameborder='0' scrolling='no' marginheight='0' marginwidth='0'></iframe>

widest gap so far and looks like it is expanding

:(
 
Nothing unusual

2ymcegn.jpg
 
Quote from hermit:

Nothing unsual

2ymcegn.jpg

GW's highest was 90%
GHW's highest was 89%
Carter's highest was 75%
Clinton's highest was 73%
Obama's highest was 69%
Reagan's highest was 68%

Nothing unusual is right. Or as you say, "unsual".
 
Quote from bugscoe:

GW's highest was 90%
GHW's highest was 89%
Carter's highest was 75%
Clinton's highest was 73%
Obama's highest was 69%
Reagan's highest was 68%

Nothing unusual is right. Or as you say, "unsual".

So one compares the highest point in a series to gauge its general trend?
 
Quote from hermit:

Nothing unusual

2ymcegn.jpg

Quote from hermit:

What part of your brain doesn't see the fact that the projection is a disingenuous exercise of propaganda and the DERIVED numbers have NOTHING to do with reality.
 
Quote from bugscoe:

GW's highest was 90%
GHW's highest was 89%
Carter's highest was 75%
Clinton's highest was 73%
Obama's highest was 69%
Reagan's highest was 68%

Nothing unusual is right. Or as you say, "unsual".

from the chart for Reagan/Carter the highest point happens during the first month in the office. this makes sense since people are deluded into thinking that the new president will make a difference. two years later the crowd realizes that the president can make very little difference in their lives so by that point they hate the guy.

in general approval/disapproval should be normalized by the quality of life of the voters at the time.
 
Quote from bugscoe:

Did you see the word "trend" in my post?

My original reply to the thread starter was about the general trend of poll numbers, why would you quote my post otherwise with irrelevant numbers?
 
Back
Top