Latest nonsense fromKrugman

Nonsense?

  • Complete nonsense

    Votes: 9 56.3%
  • Mostly nonsense

    Votes: 1 6.3%
  • Useful

    Votes: 6 37.5%

  • Total voters
    16
History shows literally the opposite. Today's conservatives are blinded by abstract principles with no empirical basis. Krugman may get some things wrong but he is right most of the time.
Empirical bases in economics = moving targets to make academic papers presentable. Krugman is wrong far more often than he's right. The irony of someone calling Krugman critics faith-based is something else.
 
I love the obsession with "credentials"....as if Krugman and others who couldn't have been more wrong haven't made that laughable. I actually thought about getting a Ph.D. in economics when I was younger. But I realized they had an inferiority complex and tried to make it like branch of math or physics. Talk about square pegs and round holes.
So, no credentials. Got it. Just lots of bluster.
 
History shows literally the opposite. Today's conservatives are blinded by abstract principles with no empirical basis. Krugman may get some things wrong but he is right most of the time.
LMFAO
OK snowflake
He’s an absolute train wreck
 
To me it is all nonsense because most theories were founded long before the 2nd millenium. The new reality is a time where markets are oversaturated with everything, company margins are mostly razor sharp, markets very efficient, real wages stagnating or sinking for the average folks, productivity increases only make a short advantage before competition adopts it, they cut out geopolitical aspects in a globalized world and so on. The theories in summary are completely obsolete. Lower interest rates won't change anything for the working poors in all countries. They aren't even mentioned in modern economy theory which is another fact, but they are essentially the doom and gloom of every economy if their circumstances and prospects change.
 
LTCM was full of people with the credentials you so admire.
I read When Genius failed when it first came out. If I recall correctly, John Meriwether took larger risks, and had more faith in the models, than did the scholars who developed them and were on the board. Moral of the story? A little bit of knowledge can be a dangerous thing in the wrong hands. Sound familiar?
 
Back
Top