Laser vs Sterling Trader Pro

Quote from LVtrader35:

Thanks for the feedback, looks like Laser is a much better option.

That's the conclusion I've come to as well but even Laser seems to be in the dark ages to be honest.

Sure these are fast but they suck really.

I know we don't have too many choices if we want the speed but hell they put a man on the moon 40 years ago and you think that they would have made these platforms so much more technologically better by now.

:mad:
 
Quote from Shreddog:

You're joking, right?
I haven't used Laser but compared to the IB API, Sterling API sucks.
The biggest problem is that Sterling cannot handle even the slightest disconnect and will completely shut down if it detects one. No background reconnects like IB, it just shuts down.
This is bad enough for a manual trader, but if you're running a program through the API it's a complete disaster.
The next problem is if you have many L2 windows open. The more you have open, the slower your API execution gets. Have more than 3 open and it's very noticeable.
Then there's the API documentation. It's seriously lacking in details and I have spent a lot of time experimenting just to figure out how things really work.
Try calling Sterling for API support. The receptionist absolutely positively will not forward you to a programmer who can actually answer your questions. And rarely can he answer your questions himself.
And I get to pay $150+ per month per login for this. If my firm offered an alternative I'd drop this platform in a heartbeat.
Regarding the original poster's question, I think it's nothing special for manual trading. It's got hot keys but has a couple annoying bugs.
First, you can't force the price to round to the nearest penny in a hot key. So if you set your hot key price to "bid" and there's a sub penny price on the bid it will set it to that. If you send at that price it will get rejected for having a sub-penny price. So you have to manually fix this price before you can transmit the order. This happens a lot on SPY.
Second, if you set your hot key to stay on the current account, when hit that hot key, the position reported in your L2 window will change to either zero or to another account's position. I've had plenty of mistrades thanks to that feature.
Sorry for the rant, but man, the topic of Sterling really sets me off. :cool:
Wow - hard to believe it's that bad. I only reviewed the docs and they were much better than IB's. It appears as though almost all of these API's suffer in one form (design,implementation) or another(tech support,documentation).
We're still in the Wild, wild west days of programmable trading. That's obvious.
 
I agree with both Syswizard and Shreddog...

Sterling has a few issues like Shreddog mentioned, but it's documentation and code examples are one thousand times better that what is available for LASER...

Genesis has no code examples other than that crappy Excel sheet on their website. I would have seriously considered joining Genesis if they had good code examples for download like Sterling has...

- mnx
 
I was torn to go with Genesis or Sterling... --> (Echo) I chose Genesis I use the laser API, and really couldn't complain, but like was mentioned there are no examples of API programs however it is well documented
 
Back
Top