Larry Summers.. "Default = Financial Armegeddon"... LIAR!

No, not that defaulting on US Treasuries wouldn't be financial armegeddon... it could. But there isn't a snowball's chance in Hell of default even if the debt ceiling isn't raised!

They're using deception to spook the people and legislature into going along with a CATASTROPHICALLY BAD wasting of assets... all to buy votes.
 
Quote from Scataphagos:

No, not that defaulting on US Treasuries wouldn't be financial armegeddon... it could. But there isn't a snowball's chance in Hell of default even if the debt ceiling isn't raised!

They're using deception to spook the people and legislature into going along with a CATASTROPHICALLY BAD wasting of assets... all to buy votes.
=========
Mr Larry Summers has said & done some wise things;
1] lobbied nnder Pres Reagan & Clinton cut capital gains tax,
2]called for cut in unemployment comp, to HELP unemployment,
3]against the Kyota Protocol
4}lectured CA gov Grey Davis, CA crises due to ''excess gov regulation.................

No wonder he finally misstepped/lied;
law of averages got him.

Moodys downgrade may mean much more troubel, long term:cool:
 
Default is pure lies. ~200 Billion in monthly revenues and ~20 billion in monthly debt service...

Thing is, it will precipitate a crash multiples worse than '08. That's guaranteed.
 
Quote from Scataphagos:
But there isn't a snowball's chance in Hell of default even if the debt ceiling isn't raised!
Can you tell me how you know that? As I understand it, the idea that the Treasury can actually prioritize interest payments over the other stuff is by no means a certainty. My understanding is that it's based on a one-page GAO legal opinion issued a long while ago. It may or may not be valid, so I, for one, wouldn't bet the farm on no default.
 
Quote from Martinghoul:

Can you tell me how you know that? As I understand it, the idea that the Treasury can actually prioritize interest payments over the other stuff is by no means a certainty. My understanding is that it's based on a one-page GAO legal opinion issued a long while ago. It may or may not be valid, so I, for one, wouldn't bet the farm on no default.

I doubt Obama and Geithner are suicidal. They won't reneg and turn a market crash into helter skelter pandemonium. Seriously, we're talking a paltry 30 billion to charity cases and grandmas in exchange for detonating a 50 megaton nuke on the economy. Makes no sense.
 
Quote from achilles28:
I doubt Obama and Geithner are suicidal. They won't reneg and turn a market crash into helter skelter pandemonium. Seriously, we're talking a paltry 30 billion to charity cases and grandmas in exchange for detonating a 50 megaton nuke on the economy. Makes no sense.
Sure, I would definitely agree with that... However, if it's technically illegal and causes some ginormous lawsuits, is it still that obvious? Anyways, hope you're right and, for the record, I think Summers is a tool.
 
Quote from Martinghoul:

Sure, I would definitely agree with that... However, if it's technically illegal and causes some ginormous lawsuits, is it still that obvious?

They broke contracts for GM and Chrysler bond holders to "save" the automakers, which was pretty much an after-thought subsequent to Maiden Lane. Seems to me that was a lot more clear cut than triage-ing payouts?
 
Quote from Martinghoul:

Sure, I would definitely agree with that... However, if it's technically illegal and causes some ginormous lawsuits, is it still that obvious? Anyways, hope you're right and, for the record, I think Summers is a tool.

Ya, here's to cooler heads. Although, you're right. I wouldn't put anything past BO.
 
Back
Top