The problem is, that however you define a trend, when they start and when they end are randomly distributed in time. You need to backtest your definition of a trend in order to get an idea if it has a statistical edge and thus lead to a positive expectancy method. Otherwise you are shooting in the dark.
back testing is over rated
unless you have a basic technical reason for what you are back testing, that may just be not there in the future, simply because it has no reason for being there and which is why most patterns disappear.
the basic problem with traders is all of them want easy money-which is there for the taking in markets-but they also want big money. easy money cannot be big money.
if you think this trade can make easy money and it is obvious and so it is high probability. which also means low reward.
you cannot ask for something which is not there.
a trend is something that goes on and on and so you can make big money.........but relatively speaking these are not so common. and the strongest of trends, for most of their life, grind and are painfully slow for those looking for a fast buck.
counter trends on the other hand are viciously fast and so all traders are attracted to them.
i trade mainly these
but i am very much aware of what i am doing: i take the small reward that is offered, in absolute terms it is small, but because it is obtained in very little time, it is worth it. you do not need to spend hours in the market watching your position.........
they say market ranges 70% of the time so why search for the elusive trend... big one......the pot at end of the rainbow