True... but is it more efficient than writing code for nontrivally complex operations?
Moreover, I'm pretty sure natural language cannot be completely free of ambiguity from context (double negatives, for example - parse it literally or idiomatically?) - so why bother for things that need to be instructed without ambiguity?
Of course, we already have natural language processor for non critical applications (sirii)
Moreover, I'm pretty sure natural language cannot be completely free of ambiguity from context (double negatives, for example - parse it literally or idiomatically?) - so why bother for things that need to be instructed without ambiguity?
Of course, we already have natural language processor for non critical applications (sirii)
Quote from loufah:
Natural language can be disambiguated if you build in enough knowledge of the context. See IBM's Watson, which could understand Jeopardy clues.

. So, am curious as to how you got this url for the icon? Thanks