Admittedly, my wording was wrong but you've all made the point. Here is what is indisputable:
1) JC is a sub group, not a broker dealer.
2) Because they are not a broker dealer, you won't get audited financials on SEC.gov as you would with any SEC registered firm.
3) Because they are not a broker dealer, your pay checks might going to get crossed against their losing traders, dependent on the financial arrangement with the BD they are a SUB group of. Unless you get paperwork explaining the terms of the arrangement from them (in writing, or a copy of their arrangement with whatever BD - price redacted is fine), you're in limbo if one of their other traders blows up.
3) Because they are not a broker dealer, you'd probably get a better deal going direct to the BD instead of wasting your time with some guys the master group needs to mark up to make money on. (Agree, not always, and maybe there are some intangibles that offset this, although I'm suspect).
4) JC Trading helps run (according to a 2008 post on this site) Nevis Trading, which is an unregistered broker dealer based in an offshore tax haven. Pretty much makes them 'part of' an unregistered broker dealer... Hmmm....
BTW, I thought they were part of WTS, not Ocean View... Of course, their website doesn't say it. I am always curious about that. Are they embarrassed? Can someone clarify the arrangement of who they are under now?
Quote from luvtrading10:
CSFX, I never claimed JC Trading is a BD...I said that their traders trade on the CBSX. I was refuting the point by SgtSlottter that they are an "unregistered BD", which they are not.
Here is the difference: Firms like Lake Street and CTG will probably get shut down as they are LLC's acting like BD's. They collect commissions and accept deposits. Those are functions of a BD and must register.
Anyway, I will stick to my original point that traders should stick to firms that have been around for a while.
Good Trading!