It’s really not a smart move for the state you represent to take yourself out of the majority party in the senate.
I’m not sure if she will not join a caucus though so she may still be able to be on the inside like other independents.
That seems like a long shot. Arizona isn’t Alaska, Republicans aren’t going to switch over there. She is toast (so is Manchin for that matter).
Now there are 3 independent senators with the Democrats
Senator King
Senator Sanders
Senator Sinema
Why are they not comfortable to identify with their party
Hobbs beat nut job Lake by only. 6%. If the Republicans nominate a competent candidate for Senate in 2024 (like a Doug Ducey and that's a big if)
It's Ruben Gallego and from my understanding he's pretty progressive. Hobbs beat nut job Lake by only .6%. If the Republicans nominate a competent candidate for Senate in 2024 (like a Doug Ducey and that's a big if) they will win that seat. If Sinema runs it could guarantee a nut job like Lake winning there as there's no runoff or ranked choice from my understanding.
Incumbents have an advantage. Being a former astronaut probably helps a little too vs. being a career liberal politician. It helps that Gallego is a military vet, but he's still basically a professional politician. Hobbs was simply a weaker candidate than Kelly as well. From my understanding she pretty much hid in her basement. Masters was just as nutty as Lake, just less charismatic/polished.Governors races(local) are different than Senate races (national).Red states like Louisiana,KY and NC has a democrat Governor and blue states Mass and Maryland just had Republican Governors.
A better comparison would be Kelly who won by 5 points.
View attachment 301231
There will also be much higher turnout in a presidential year favoring The Dem even more.