Kushner: Trump ‘knows Republicans are stupid’

[Max E.]

In general i think every politician knows that voters are stupid. Do you think charlatans like jesse jackson or al sharpton would be rich from supposedly being positive influences, if the vast majority of the population wasnt retarded? How bout that Joel Osteen guy who has like eight private jets and convinces old ladies to donate to god every week.

 

[Tom B]

91 % is very good.I'd love for pollsters to do the same extensive and frequent polling on the state level as they do in the national polls but with the popular vote winner winning 91 % of the time I know the cost outweigh the benefits.Extensive and frequent polling is expensive,just ask Trump


http://origin-nyi.thehill.com/blogs...es/303615-trump-camp-refusing-to-pay-pollster

Trump camp refusing to pay pollster

By Mark Hensch - 10/31/16 02:16 PM EDT

Donald Trump’s presidential campaign is reportedly refusing to pay some of veteran Republican pollster Tony Fabrizio's expenses.

The campaign’s latest Federal Election Commission (FEC) report shows it contesting $766,756.67 that Fabrizio’s firm says it is owed for polling, The Washington Post reported Monday.

Hopefully, all democrats will realy o

We are only 17 % into the century.It happened twice in a short time period in 1876 and 1888 but didn't happen again until 2000.

I hope the dnc and democrat candidates rely on polling statistics from the 1800s, just like you.

 

[Tony Stark]

Hopefully, all democrats will realy o

I hope the dnc and democrat candidates rely on polling statistics from the 1800s, just like you.

Worked in the 1900's too.I hope republicans continue to believe in skewed polls and the 9 % chance of winning without the popular vote.Even going by the 17 years of this century the odds are 60 % .I'll take 91 or 60 % over 9 and 40%.

 

[Tom B]

Worked in the 1900's too.I hope republicans continue to believe in skewed polls and the 9 % chance of winning without the popular vote.Even going by the 17 years of this century the odds are 60 % .I'll take 91 or 60 % over 9 and 40%.

Skewed polls? Stay on topic, Sharpton.


60% of the time, it works all of the time.

 

[jem]

you are talking about the polls that unskewed days before the election. most of the polls were crooked all season making everyone think Hillary was going to win big. They used crooked samples and there only a few Americans explaining that. Many of us here at ET were on top of the issue.

so by way which polls are you claiming were spot on.
Tony's polls? or the polls I said were accurate at the time?

lets pin you down on this.

Let fact speak for itself. The polls had the result (popular vote of course. Since that is what they sample for) spot on within the margin of error. Check it it out for yourself.

 

[jem]

here is what I said on nov.. 7th.


its way too close to call. The algo was quite satisfied with the templates after the herding. So its looks like Hillary has a slight national lead overall by about 1 to 2 points after unskewing and averaging.

So its too close to call.

I find myself and the algo agreeing with Nate Silver's simulations lately.

Because most the national polls unskewed during the herding last week I now see Nate;s work as making sense. Instead of garbage in garbage out as it was before the herding... his work is now very "tradeable".



If you tell me who wins florida, colorado, and Pennsylvania... that is what I will be watching.