now you and tony seem to be one of the rare fools in the universe who claim the polls were good. as you usually do... you reshape history to make an establishment argument.
the polls were slanted towards clinton by massive amounts until they hearded right in front of the election. I predicted that would happen on the poll thread we had with Tony in both 2012 and 2016. I called it unskewing. Nate Silver called it herding.
The crooked polls which had hillary with a lead outside the margin of error were using samples that had democrats in the lead by plus 8 and plus 10 and sometimes more. I explained that when you unskewed the polls to a template which matched up with the Obama election the polls showed the race was in the margin for error. I pointed out that Nate Silbers worked therefore showed that Trump could win because hillary's excess democrats were crowded into just a few states.
I explained all that real time on the thread below. so please don't act like you have some sort of superior insight. I would bet you were making fun of the jem aglo
Here was a post on the thread where I showed how the polls unskewed right in front of the election. Go back and read the thread if you wish to see how I called out the crooked polls real time.
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...-winning-even-without-the-algo.301548/page-86