Quote from nitro in the Psychology.. Has anyone thought about how much you SHOULD make thread:
06-10-13 02:49 PM
I just look at what my bots make, then I look at what fraction of the liquidity I participate in. Then it is simple arithmetic.
There are only three variables in trading success imo:
1) A consistantly profitable system.
2) The liquidity to execute that system.
3) The confidence to hit hard when the odds are in your favor. The discipline to scale back when things seem wrong.
Theorem: The technological know-how to automate 1. This is important to me since my psychology would not allow me to sit in front of a computer vegitating.
In fact, if you start your search with these three things as axiomatic, you can work your way backwards to a profitable system that fits your psychology. Really, since most people have never seen a profitable system, the hardest part is #3.
I can tell you that even though I have 1, 2, and 3, it is amazing how much of my skill as a programmer I needed in order to make it work. Worse, I needed knowledge of the mathematical sciences to make it work (if I had access to institutional order flow - this affects 2 above, this is less true). Even now, I still struggle to improve it, without making it worse. It is frightening to me when I see people aimlessly trying to succeed trading as a substitute for steady income. Once you have walked down this path, you realize just how hard it is. The greatest chance of success from trading is to not need the income from it, even if you have 1,2, 3 above!
Based on this criteria, I see no reason why I shouldn't be making $500,000 year from just trading, with an relatively painless extrapolation to $20M a year. But it is pointless to talk about it until I have walked THAT path.
Hmm.... quite interesting.... Clearly I have missed something between this thread and the one mentioned in the post above...