Quote from shortie:
in early march the older NFV gave a slip and remained stubbornly short as the market kept moving higher. would the latest NFV incarnation had handled it better?
Quote from nltro:
And on another note, I have fired up the toaster oven (microwave on the fritz), and put the bacon-strip hoagie/panini on a sheet of aluminum foil to prepare for toasting. With any luck, the foil should keep the feces from contaminating the toaster.... Got a bad feeling now that the 1130 level is going to be breached in short order. Man will my breath stink tomorrow![]()
VNFV (very new fair value)
Quote from Pekelo:
Finally I got the impostor thingy, well, that shortie guy is on my ignore... As much as nltro might be an asshole, he does have a point.(but he goes on ignore anyway)
The old FV didn't work, and as this recent fiasco proves, the NFV isn't much better. Let's face it, it is nothing but a glorified Martingale system. If the position goes 35 pts against your first entry that means:
1. Your edge for the first entry was nonexistent.
2. You are trading against the trend....
So maybe it is time to reevaluate the whole thinking behind the "I know better where the market should be" notion...
No, that thing thinks the "FV" of the market is about 950.Quote from shortie:
in early march the older NFV gave a slip and remained stubbornly short as the market kept moving higher. would the latest NFV incarnation had handled it better?
I don't think so. I don't keep that sort of statistic. My initial instinct is that we would be over-thinking it...Quote from shortie:
..do you think that it was a red flag when SPX went too quickly from oversold (~-30 points) to overbought (+30 points and more)? could this type of a jump be a warning sign for the future signals?