Koch funded climate skeptic declares global warming is real

On NASA's website is this.....

Recommended by NASA

Climate Change

climate.nasa.gov/index
Current news and data streams about global warming and climate change from NASA


http://nasasearch.nasa.gov/search?utf8=✓&affiliate=nasa&query=global+warming

So it seems this site has the full confidence of NASA.

But for the denialist faithful that's not good enough.

Simply because it can be reached by a search engine because it is a sub-domain of NASA does not imply that the website maintained by university graduate students has any type of confidence from NASA employees.

I expect that we will see it taken down within the next three years so avoid further embarrassment.
 
here it is for the troll. I will post this til he posts science showing man made co2 is causing warming...

note for agw nutters who have trouble reading charts... the the green lags but follows the blue.

1-s2.0-S0921818112001658-gr5.jpg






Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 11–12 months behind changes in global sea surface temperature and 9.5–10 months behind changes in global air surface temperature. Changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.

Global and Planetary Change Volume 100, January 2013, Pages 51–69

The phase relation between atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperature

Ole Humlum a, b

Kjell Stordahl c

Jan-Erik Solheim d

a) Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1047 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway

b) Department of Geology, University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS), P.O. Box 156, N-9171 Longyearbyen, Svalbard, Norway

c) Telenor Norway, Finance, N-1331 Fornebu, Norway

d) Department of Physics and Technology, University of Tromsø, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.08.008, How to Cite or Link Using DOI

Abstract

Using data series on atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperatures we investigate the phase relation (leads/lags) between these for the period January 1980 to December 2011. Ice cores show atmospheric CO2variations to lag behind atmospheric temperature changes on a century to millennium scale, but modern temperature is expected to lag changes in atmospheric CO2, as the atmospheric temperature increase since about 1975 generally is assumed to be caused by the modern increase in CO2. In our analysis we use eight well-known datasets: 1) globally averaged well-mixed marine boundary layer CO2 data, 2) HadCRUT3 surface air temperature data, 3) GISS surface air temperature data, 4) NCDC surface air temperature data, 5) HadSST2 sea surface data, 6) UAH lower troposphere temperature data series, 7) CDIAC data on release of anthropogene CO2, and 8) GWP data on volcanic eruptions. Annual cycles are present in all datasets except 7) and 8), and to remove the influence of these we analyze 12-month averaged data. We find a high degree of co-variation between all data series except 7) and 8), but with changes in CO2 always lagging changes in temperature. The maximum positive correlation between CO2 and temperature is found for CO2 lagging 11–12 months in relation to global sea surface temperature, 9.5–10 months to global surface air temperature, and about 9 months to global lower troposphere temperature. The correlation between changes in ocean temperatures and atmospheric CO2 is high, but do not explain all observed changes.

Highlights

► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 11–12 months behind changes in global sea surface temperature. ► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 9.5–10 months behind changes in global air surface temperature. ► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 9 months behind changes in global lower troposphere temperature. ► Changes in ocean temperatures explain a substantial part of the observed changes in atmospheric CO2 since January 1980. ► Changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.
 
False. We've been through this.

Yes we have. How many times do we need to outline the data measurements showing increasing ice.

Or should we just wait for another ship with a 'global warming research team' gets stuck in the Antarctic ice providing amusement for everyone.
 
Yes we have. How many times do we need to outline the data measurements showing increasing ice.

Or should we just wait for another ship with a 'global warming research team' gets stuck in the Antarctic ice providing amusement for everyone.

:D
 
Yes we have. How many times do we need to outline the data measurements showing increasing ice.

Or should we just wait for another ship with a 'global warming research team' gets stuck in the Antarctic ice providing amusement for everyone.

The sea ice extent has grown, the land ice mass is decreasing rapidly, and overall Antarctica's ice is melting. The extent has grown because fresh water floats. Where is all the new fresh water coming from? I'll give you a hint...
 
The sea ice extent has grown, the land ice mass is decreasing rapidly, and overall Antarctica's ice is melting. The extent has grown because fresh water floats. Where is all the new fresh water coming from? I'll give you a hint...

Have you looked at any satellite photos of the Antarctic land ice over the past three decades? Decreasing rapidly - I think not. Increasing - Yes.
 
Back
Top