Dividend reinvesting the S&P 500 is ~ a 50% beat on the S&P 500 without reinvesting. After adjusting for inflation, ~6% vs 3%. I DO NOT FOLLOW THE PREMISE AND WANT TO KNOW WHAT IM MISSING NOT JUST LISTEN TO ME BECAUES I"M OLD
Ummmmmmm what?
The S&P 500 is the same S&P 500 index no matter who is swapped in and out over the years
You really aren’t making sense
Listen here sonny. No reason to shout. My hearing aids work just fine.I DO NOT FOLLOW THE PREMISE AND WANT TO KNOW WHAT IM MISSING NOT JUST LISTEN TO ME BECAUES I"M OLD
1- I’m not old. But I’ve been doing this for 20 yearsThat logic doesn't fly old man. You can do the same thing with a random stock from the S&P index from 1989. It's likely to be gone by now. So similarly, you'd rebalance your dividend basket.
Down $4.17
Investors lost more than 2 1/2 years of dividend income today ($1.56/yr payout).
Another great example why investing for dividends is a horrible strategy.
I named 16 of the Bluest of the Blue Chips.Cherry picked example. I was given 1 share of Disney on the day that I was born as a gift. 36 years later, that 1 share with continuous dividend reinvesting and some stock splits has grown to 94.xx shares of stock. Not a bad return.
Surprised that KO dropped as much as it did. I sold a few of the 51 calls expiring tomorrow before earnings. Didn't love the trade given the low IV, but wanted to do something. Glad I didn't sell puts.