KKK Grand Dragon Endorses Hillary Clinton

Klan leader claims KKK has given $20K to Clinton campaign
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/26/klan-leader-claims-kkk-has-given-20k-clinton-campa/

Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign has received more than $20,000 in donations contributed by members of the Ku Klux Klan, a prominent member of the hate group said Monday.

“For the KKK, Clinton is our choice,” said Will Quigg, California Grand Dragon for the Loyal White Knights, Vocativ reported.

Mr. Quigg, the leader of the Klan’s California chapter, announced last month that he had abandoned supporting Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump in lieu of backing his likely Democratic opponent. The Klansman claims that members have raised more than $20,000 for Mrs. Clinton and have donated it anonymously to her campaign.

“She is friends with the Klan,” Mr. Quigg told Vocativ. “A lot of people don’t realize that.”
 
Senator Byrd was hillarys hero. She loved him. Gave long glowing speeches about what a great kkk grand dragon leader he was.

Of course the media doesn't mention that. Instead they accuse trump of being a racist with zero actual proof he is.

Saul Alinsky, another Hillary mentor, dedicated his Marxist textbook to lucifer aka the devil. Again, the media doesn't say jack shit. Traitors amongst us
 
Senator Byrd was hillarys hero. She loved him. Gave long glowing speeches about what a great kkk grand dragon leader he was.

Of course the media doesn't mention that. Instead they accuse trump of being a racist with zero actual proof he is.

Saul Alinsky, another Hillary mentor, dedicated his Marxist textbook to lucifer aka the devil. Again, the media doesn't say jack shit. Traitors amongst us


mostlyfalse.gif
MOSTLY FALSE


WHAT'S TRUE: Saul Alinsky wrote an epigraph describing the rebellious angel Lucifer as 'the first radical known to man' in his book 'Rules for Radicals.'

WHAT'S FALSE: Alinsky dedicated 'Rules for Radicals' to Lucifer.


http://www.snopes.com/saul-alinsky-dedicated-rules-for-radicals-to-lucifer/
 
mostlyfalse.gif
MOSTLY FALSE


WHAT'S TRUE: Saul Alinsky wrote an epigraph describing the rebellious angel Lucifer as 'the first radical known to man' in his book 'Rules for Radicals.'

WHAT'S FALSE: Alinsky dedicated 'Rules for Radicals' to Lucifer.


http://www.snopes.com/saul-alinsky-dedicated-rules-for-radicals-to-lucifer/
Shut the fuck up. Snopes is soros funded.

snopes is an authority on absolutely nothing. Just another liberal trash website. Please quote me media matters next as an "authoritative source"
 
Shut the fuck up. Snopes is soros funded.

snopes is an authority on absolutely nothing. Just another liberal trash website. Please quote me media matters next as an "authoritative source"


Yeah, sure. Stay ignorant and deluded. You batshit crazy right wingers do it so well.

It's false. You are, once again, wrong. Yes, anything that conflicts with your hysterical delusions you find a way to ignore.

Better go run back to Breitbart.
 
Yeah, sure. Stay ignorant and deluded. You batshit crazy right wingers do it so well.

It's false. You are, once again, wrong. Yes, anything that conflicts with your hysterical delusions you find a way to ignore.

Better go run back to Breitbart.

Snopes is Soros funded. Just another Left-wing rag.
 
Snopes is Soros funded. Just another Left-wing rag.


You cannot admit that you were wrong. Pretty sad but typical of delusional ignorant right wing nut jobs.


WHAT'S TRUE: Saul Alinsky wrote an epigraph describing the rebellious angel Lucifer as 'the first radical known to man' in his book 'Rules for Radicals.'

WHAT'S FALSE: Alinsky dedicated 'Rules for Radicals' to Lucifer.


This is easily confirmed by looking at the book. Something right wingers do not do.


What's more......Snopes is NOT a left wing rag and NOT funded by Soros. It is an even handed finder of the truth. Something that you hate.

You are incredibly ignorant and deluded. Please get help.....

There is currently no readily available evidence that George Soros has funded snopes.com, nor are the financial record for snopes, Soros, or financial entities they control open to inspection (what would be necessary to falsify the claim). The claim is analogous to Russell's Teapot.

Here is an independent opinion from TruthOrFiction.com, a similar themed site:

Snopes.com is an excellent site that has become an authoritative source for information about urban legends and forwarded emails. We regard David and Barbara Mikkelson, the founders and operators of Snopes.com, as colleagues and professional researchers who have earned a good reputation for what they do.

We can give a unique perspective on this story because we do the same kind of work as Snopes.com and have sometimes been the target of similar criticism.

We’ve got a collection of emails that have come to TruthOrFiction.com accusing us of being “right wing whackos” as well as “liberals” and “communists.” We’ve been suspected of being owned and operated by both Republicans and Democrats. We’ve been called “Christian propagandists” as well as “atheists pretending to be neutral.” We occasionally receive emails that have elaborate theories about who “really” owns us and what our “real” motives are.

The bottom line is that if you try to report the truth, there will be those who don’t like the truth you’ve reported and who will develop suspicions about why you did.

That, in our view, is what is happening with Snopes.

- http://www.truthorfiction.com/snopes/
 
Back
Top