tomhaden,</b> please define your interpretation of the term "scam".
... I know a few TI students using the (former approach) logic of oscillator divergence profitably for years.
I'm a former TI student, and while the method of trading divergences works pretty well once you become a pro at it just like most other logical systems , one of the many problems with the
Traders International ("TI") Course is that they stressed the 2pt Stop/2pt Target as being the one to choose and optimal. They also said you could let the trade run, but were
vague in terms of when you should close it ...
that's because they didn't know.
Another problem is that they believed so little in the ultimate positive expectation of their system that Ashfin went-in wallet first with a guy named
Franz Shoar, a big-time CON, SCAM ARTIST and PAPER TRADER, who conned the crap out of anyone who would listen to him and the stories of his
BullsEye Signals, which he claimed where real trades netting $100,000 at a pop, when they were not. When TI came here and started posting their advertisements they got busted big-time, and turned tail and ran.
(When I was there, 6 mos to a year before I came here) I paid for the TI Course, so that's where I put my focus, the problem that everyone encountered with he system is that you would need a 70% win rate to make about 800 gross per month, per contract, the problem was, the system didn't have it
(way too much detail to get into here).
... Not once has a method spinner = junkie ever said, <i>"Austin, to be honest the problem really is me. When it's all boiled down, I had the wrong expectations for success.</i> ... Thought I could spend x-amount of money and learn how to trade in mindless, A-B-C fashion."
No, the former Traders International students just thought they could learn how to trade, and why not, it's what they where told, after all, and
what they paid their money for.
"I thought paying for information would let me circumvent the need to master my own emotional control. I tried each approach for a few days = weeks, but insisted on trading real money from day one. I didn't use good money management. I cannot control my own emotions, which compel me to take too many trades, not enough trades and the wrong trades."
Actually, the TI Course stresses that you must have at least 10 consecutive days of trading the system with a win before you can trade live money, but they don't actually give you any of the win/loss stats to help teach a trader how to really manager their money correctly, they just tell the traders they can win 2pts ($100) bucks every days by trading their system. If that were even remotely true, they would not have had Franz and Dave and whoever else pumping the services of a
con man.
"I cannot help adding in my own previous poor experiences = baggage to each new attempt. To be honest Austin, I'm an emotional wreckage in need of a rest."</i>
Shrug, outing a scammer isn't baggage, it's experience ... there is a difference.
In five minutes I'm leaving for the day and haven't much time to elaborate here. Suffice it to say that calling all of the programs listed a "scam" is pure bullsh*t. What you are really saying is this: "All of them proclaim instant, easy path to trading success with nil effort on the user's part."
No, outting YOU as a sammer is
pure bullsh*t. Traders International is definitely SCAM CITY, and I haven't had any
direct experience with these other
systems so I can't speak to what they
are or are not, that's OK, I really don't
need to.
Go back and read thru all of the offers posted on your list. The ones that don't proclaim instant, easy success to trading are legit. Some of them offer solid info to the trade entry = execution part of trading that saves years of time and thousands $$ to learn. You are responsible for the self-learning and emotional control part. Marry all aspects of trading success, and you'll find some of the material on that errant list to be anything but a scam.
You make a valid and well thought-out arguement in the above paragraph ... and I agree with you.
1)
Sold trade entry. Yes, someone selling a system most definitely should have a system that offers solid trade entry.
2)
Trader is responsible for the self-learning. Yes, a trader must study hard and apply themselves rigoursly to the method.
3)
Trader is responsible for emotional control. Yes, very, very true. The ability to control one's emotions though will in-part come from having a system that actually "works".
4) While some of those systems may be good
(and actually NOT A SCAM, as they are posted to be), the truth of the matter
for anyone reading this thread is that a trader can save a bundle and actually do much better by just reading through threads here at
Elite Trader, studying, and applying themselves to the task-at-hand.
Not that these threads will give you the
Key's to Puzzle (though some of them might, ya never know), they will help a trader begin to learn the rules by which they can learn to trade, and trade well.
5)
... you'll find some of the material on that errant list to be anything but a scam. Yes, some of those systems may be
OK to actually good, but sorting through the
BS Artists is going to cost a trader
quite a bundle in terms of money spent on a system, and then lost trading it, to actually find a "system that works" (maybe) - ultimately, I don't believe vendor shopping makes for a very good
trade-off.
For me personally, I realized that if I wanted to learn how to trade, I would have to do it myself, nobody's going to give me a system which can trade my money better than I can, for cash money. -
well actually, they might, but it's going to cost me too much money to buy it.
... and a
Very Happy Thanksgiving to you and everyone else. too

.