King Obama: The Fall

Quote from RCG Trader:

1. Only half the country pays income tax.

2. This redistribution of wealth is good for society.
1. True
2. False

And, I want to apologize for my last name calling post to you. I was in a retaliatory mood and got tired of seeing you call us southern white guys "rednecks." I'm sorry I retaliated in that way.
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

Wow, you really are great at cutting a pasting articles, but you fall into the same trap each time. The entire article is basing it's "inflation expectations" on the treasury market, and low yields. It has, of course, been pointed out many times that the treasury market is at record low yields because the Fed is buying 60-80% of all the debt being issued (depending on duration). Since the Fed is spending trillions of dollars to keep rates low, you (and other main stream clown reporters) think that's indicative of low rates.

I give you a TON of credit for even taking the time to address our own village idiot. No matter how many times you refute the guy's failed logic, he comes back for more.

He really is one of the brainwashed masses.
 
Quote from pspr:

1. True
2. False

And, I want to apologize for my last name calling post to you. I was in a retaliatory mood and got tired of seeing you call us southern white guys "rednecks." I'm sorry I retaliated in that way.

I am sorry for lowering myself to the" tactics" of braincell, also. Although he has no business making fun of people of a different segment than himself, if he can't take the heat.
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

1. Only half the country pays income tax.

2. This redistribution of wealth is good for society.
Too stupid to answer the question eh?
attachment.php
 

Attachments

Quote from Ricter:

Rofl, it's your own thread, goof!

So you're referring to the job number thread? How can it be "early to pop the cork" when the numbers were released by the BLS officially? Isn't it the BLS that should be questioned when numbers magically recover the next month?

Many have said it - the BLS uses more of a "goal seek" model than any mathematical algorithm.

Even with revisions, the LFPR was still at a 30 year low.
 
Quote from denner:

I give you a TON of credit for even taking the time to address our own village idiot. No matter how many times you refute the guy's failed logic, he comes back for more.

He really is one of the brainwashed masses.

I just get a kick out of it. When the day is slow, there's no better enjoyment than going a few rounds with a clueless Keynesian.
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

So you're referring to the job number thread? How can it be "early to pop the cork" when the numbers were released by the BLS officially? Isn't it the BLS that should be questioned when numbers magically recover the next month?


attachment.php
 

Attachments

EIA Petroleum Status Report

"Commercial oil inventories inched 0.2 million barrels higher in the May 3 week to a new record of 395.5 million barrels as a rise in domestic oil output helped offset both a slowing in oil imports and a rise in refinery inputs. At 87.0 percent, refineries operated at the highest rate of capacity since early January. But the increase in output was centered entirely in distillates, where inventories rose 1.8 million barrels, and not in gasoline where output slowed slightly and where inventories fell slightly, by 0.9 million barrels. Indications on final demand from the wholesale sector point to continued softness for gasoline, where wholesale supplies are down 2.4 percent year-on-year, and increasing softness for distillates where supplies are down 5.1 percent which is the weakest rate since late January. The rise in oil inventories together with the indications of soft demand are not positives for oil which is down 50 cents to test $96 in early reaction to today's report."

<img src="http://bloomberg.econoday.com/showimage.asp?imageid=24492">

http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/economic-calendar/
 
Quote from Ricter:

..."The rise in oil inventories together with the indications of soft demand are not positives for oil which is down 50 cents to test $96 in early reaction to today's report."

Actually it up 88 cents to $96.50 the better part of 1% in a day, moron.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

Actually it up 88 cents to $96.50 the better part of 1% in a day, moron.

Yeah, I'm seeing it up as well. Talk about popping the cork early.
 
Back
Top