Would you say that a 1200-calorie diet for a ~240-pound man who plans to be physically active qualifies as a crash diet?I will answer for him. Because he has 58 lbs of fat to lose, that's why.
Would you say that a 1200-calorie diet for a ~240-pound man who plans to be physically active qualifies as a crash diet?I will answer for him. Because he has 58 lbs of fat to lose, that's why.
I will answer for him. Because he has 58 lbs of fat to lose, that's why.
As I'm sure you know, crash diets don't work.It's getting in the crashy zone for sure but he's never going to lose fat at a rate he's happy with on a diet over 2,000 calories per day. I mean, 2,400 is his daily maintenance amount so he's got to cut into that pretty hard to lose real fat.
His Atkins diet is dictating his macros, which is basically a protein/fat dominated plan.Unless he is a contestant in a fat loss show or has a medical reason for the speedy rate of weight loss i see this as completely irresponsible even under a dr. supervision.
Since you seem to suggest this is a good idea, would you care to break down his optimal macros for us?
His Atkins diet is dictating his macros, which is basically a protein/fat dominated plan.
As I'm sure you know, crash diets don't work.
Chances are, he'll lose some muscle, in which case it will be easier to regain the weight. Next, if the caloric intake is low enough, it will negatively affect his thyroid function, reduce his testosterone level and increase his cortisol output.
Anything other than a sustainable lifestyle change is almost certainly transitory.

I applaud his effort and I do wish him the best. But it shouldn't be an all-or-nothing proposition of trying to undo years of neglect in a matter of weeks or a few months.The bottom line is that he's trying. With 58lbs of fat to lose, he needs a framework to follow and Atkins will give him that. It may not last forever, but it's worth a shot instead of doing nothing IMO.