And I thought this thread was about keeping it simple. Am I in the wrong place? No, just checked again to be sure.
Let's see, so after the entry which is very simple, as any breakout entry is, then it becomes a simple matter of: applying simple reversal techniques if I subjectively determine chop, and simple exit techniques if I have drawn the trendlines correctly, and simple swings if I have perceived the important reaction lows and highs correctly.
Of course none of it occurs if a simple gap of a simple percentage happens first.
I didn't realize the level of simplicity we were discussing here. Silly me, I posted a moving average crossover method that works but it was found to be unsatisfactory for a 1 lot trader.
So here is another very simple method that I have used very successfully:
First I begin with a simple range breakout method of 27 minutes unless there is news then I use 36 minutes. The reasons why are obvious. I use a 9 minute chart which neatly divides into the breakout time period. A caveat is if the opening tick for the new day beginning at 0930 EST is outside of the normal variance then I will not trade. The normal variance is actuall y a simple average of the 10 day normal variance multiplied by the ATR and divided by Pi.
Okay this is where it gets a bit subjective, but this method is really simple and although I am the only one who can trade it, it is indeed simple. At some point when I think that the market has reached an emotionl crescendo such both longs and shorts are in a state of frenzy, which is a fairly simple thing to discern, I employ at that time Fourier Analyisis. From then on I know longer use the 9 minute chart, but rather the 2, 3, 7, 11, and 12 minute charts.
These charts are significant because they are important craps numbers and instantly let me know if this is a winning trade or losing trade. If the trade is a short I look to the 2 , 3, and 12 minute charts, if the trade is long I use the 7 and 11 charts. Sometimes I will use all in combination depending on the market.
From here it would be an insult for me to continue explaining this simple method because it is so simple.
Of course I would be happy to discuss the specifics if asked, I mean, why would I post on a board if I weren't more than happy to discuss this most simple method.
