If you backtest this stuff, you'll find that days when price takes off and never looks back are rare.
Right, which is why I don't think it's a good idea to take an entry which relies on that happening to work.
Trying to accommodate them affects the strategy, which must be applied every day, not just on those days when price behaves in an unusual way.
I agree. What I'm suggesting is not trying to accomodate a rare situation, but rather not to be suckered into something that might act like a rare situation but most likely turn out not to be; a procedure that should not come into play in typical conditions.
To me, passing on entry due to an uncorrected single swing OR is very similar to passing due to an xbar gobbling up most of the OR and hitting entry trigger at it's end.
So, I am not clear... are you suggesting that the 1064.00 BO entry should've been taken systematically regardless of the one-directional OR?
Right, which is why I don't think it's a good idea to take an entry which relies on that happening to work.
Trying to accommodate them affects the strategy, which must be applied every day, not just on those days when price behaves in an unusual way.
I agree. What I'm suggesting is not trying to accomodate a rare situation, but rather not to be suckered into something that might act like a rare situation but most likely turn out not to be; a procedure that should not come into play in typical conditions.
To me, passing on entry due to an uncorrected single swing OR is very similar to passing due to an xbar gobbling up most of the OR and hitting entry trigger at it's end.
So, I am not clear... are you suggesting that the 1064.00 BO entry should've been taken systematically regardless of the one-directional OR?