Quote from lindq:
Because I like to keep things simple, I was drawn to these threads. But....duh! You folks make space travel look like a cake walk!
Quote from spedblavio:
I think the stuff Db's talking about is about as elemental, tried-and-true basic TA as you can get.
The principles are so straightforward that they seem to lend themselves to making strict mechanical rules, but this is somewhat illusory and that's where it seems to get "complicated".
Probably should be tracked as mechanically as possible, but actual executions will be better with more experience and the ability to subconciously "drive the car" and be aware of various things without having to think about them so much.
Quote from dbphoenix:
Why do you say that?
--Db
Quote from Biomech:
Well, I guess I should say I'm not sure if today was a good test or not. It was a fairly atypical day compared to the last couple of months.
Quote from dbphoenix:
As for being a good test, that depends on what you mean by "good test". The opening low was 22, so the target was 50. Unfortunately, if you didn't play the gap, the entry point would have been two points above the opening high, or 46.5. If you've chosen to exit at the target, you'd have made 3.5. If you've chosen to use an end-of-bar stop, you'd have made a little less.
--Db
Quote from Biomech:
it is hard for me to tell exactly when the opening range is established. That is one of the softer points of the strategy that takes some discretion
Quote from dbphoenix:
Doesn't have to be. If you're mechanically-minded, just set a time like Mike and Natalie did, say a 20m bar (0950) or a 30m bar (1000), then buy or short that bar. You don't have to exercise discretion unless you want to.
--Db