Keepin it multi-cultural in Australia

1*u1RZ2e4tZKvAd1drE80MpA.png


Apr 22, 2015

Headed to the Land Down Under

Economic Growth and Shared Language Go a Long Way in Promoting Migration

www.medium.com/migration-issues/why-americans-are-leaving-for-the-land-down-under-75bad6dfba39

In my last post, I presented data on the number of US-born individuals living abroad, and noted that there was only one country that had received more historic migration from the US than the US had received from it: Australia. For some reason, Australia has succeeded in attracting a relatively larger US diaspora than other countries.

Because there’s only one country in the world to hold this distinction, it seemed only fitting that I should dig deeper and figure out what’s going on. As I will show, migration to Australia is helped along by a shared language and Australia’s robust economic growth. A historically pro-immigration settlement policy doesn’t hurt, either.
 
You should do some research and look at the similarities and connections between Roman catholicism, Islam and Babylonian planetary and Deity worship.

Are you aware the roman's worshiped planetary Gods and were threatened and alarmed at the rise of Christianity and persecuted Christians ?


Catholicism is the mother of Christianity. Peter was the first pope on 'which Christ's church was built'. The fact that every other Christian sect broke off from Catholicism because they wanted their cut is irrelevant to your beliefs or mine. The Roman Catholic (read Chrisitan) church was well established by the time Islam came around ~600AD; with the 1st Christian Roman emperor (Constantine) having converted 300 years earlier.
 
Last edited:
IOW just like in Saudi Arabia. We boycotted South Africa because their political system offended liberals. With Saudi Arabia, we do their bidding, allow them to attack our cities and finance radical mosques and schools in our midst and we rush to sell them advanced weapons systems.

Your premise that only "liberals" were offended by systematic racism in South Africa isn't true at all. Yes, it is possible you were supportive of their policies. But you would be in a tiny minority of the US that believed in apartheid and racial segregation. Plus the mass killings and imprisonments under all sorts of false pretenses to retain control over the black population.
 
Your premise that only "liberals" were offended by systematic racism in South Africa isn't true at all. Yes, it is possible you were supportive of their policies. But you would be in a tiny minority of the US that believed in apartheid and racial segregation. Plus the mass killings and imprisonments under all sorts of false pretenses to retain control over the black population.

Boo hoo. Did the canadian settlers ask the opinion of the natives they killed and enslaved? SA was a prosperous civilized country. Now it's on the verge of becoming yet another failed African kleptocracy that can't feed itself. You know, like Zimbabwe, nee Rhodesia.

My point however was to point out the hypocrisy in mounting an international crusade to overturn an imperfect yet functional liberal democracy in SA while studiously ignoring far worse repression in Saudi Arabia. Unlike Saudi Arabia, the South Africans had not been robbing us for decades through an international cartel controlling oil and using the money they stole to buy off our politicians.
 
Back
Top