Quote from stonedinvestor:
What up BioB? Wish I had that name! My first name is Ben and I have always been big into biotech. I think you have made several good points about COR and entry prices, although if you scale in the way you proposed to, you would be taking a $7.95 or whatever you pay for commission over and over again.
thank you., Ben! with $1000 buys, the $10 i pay is 1%, but that goes down proportionally with larger trades. figuring in commision would make the calcs more complex, but yes, that did cross my mind. commission is an insignificant effect for my trading (usually), and also there is no extra set of entries on a Schedule D because pretty much all my trading is in IRAs. OTOH ... there was a systematic error in my calculations that nobody remarked on, which ALSO becomes more significant (like commissions) when the trade sizes are relatively small. that is, you can't trade fractional shares. so, because it's only a 0.5% chance (for a $2 stock) that a whole number of shares will be bought with $1000 (and less with larger trades size), you're always buying less than tha "$1000" of stock, so the numerators in the final calculation are less than $4000 or $5000, which would LOWER the average buy price if it was factored in. how much? you can do the math. the "whole share effect" is a small effect, inversely proportional to the size of the buy and also inversely proportional to the share price (cost/price). the fractional share effect would move the average lower, while commisions would raise it higher. by how much? it depends on the stock price, size of the buys, and commission. i see it as a wash with one effect cancelling out the other. good enuf for guvment work we used to say.
I think the real mistake and we share this one 100% is this RUSH to reinvest. It's drug like and unexplainable but why must there always be something to rotate into?
in my case, after the 88% gain on CBLI and seeing it collapse further and further after i got out, i felll prey to the "separate accounts" fallacy which is what makes a gambler take riskier bets when they just scored a win. it feels like they're playing with the "house's money" which is actually now THEIR OWN money and should be guarded as carefully as if it was coming from anywhere.
[
This gets worse when you think you may have left money on the table & you try to make up for it. I'm embarrassed to say this can get ultimate worst when you take a big hit and then take the approach I need a 100% winner NOW. And away we go down the drain.
Always invest from strength even if you are scouring the biggest losers list. So for me that's Relative Strength on a down day and that's why I'm looking at CLN today.
i'll check it out and get back to ya! and ditto for BSD Medical.
Another relative strength play we must look at today is outside of biotech it is AENS- This is an alternative energy play it's old ADM management and they are going to build 2 Ethanol plants. On a day when FTEK is slapped for $2 and the whole alt energy space is red why would this ultra volatile name be trading so well? > AENS Alternative Energy Sources I (OTC BB) 1.14 -0.03 ( -2.15%)
Open 1.19 High 1.19 Low 1.14 Volume 106,068
Prev Close 1.17 52-Wk High 2.98 52-Wk Low 0.16 P/E Ratio n/a
Bid / Size 1.14 x 500 Ask/Size 1.15 x 1,200 EPS -0.03
Market Cap 46.2M* Shares Outstanding 40,500,000*
*Numbers include tradable shares only [/B]
the two alternative-fuels stocks on i've been following are XNL (turns garbage to biofuels) and SUF (they claim that "sono-cracking" turns heavy oil into the more desirable light sweet kind). i think Mark Cuban is saying SUF is a fraud and he's shorting it and bashing it. i think. he's not always right but he CAN kill a small stock regardless. if you look at worldwise oild reserves, most of it is in the heavier grades of oil, with the HUGE oil-tar sands of Canada. if someone can come up with an economical way to turn tar into sweet crude, they'll make a mint.
have you ever looked at SUF and XNL in that space?
yesterday? i bought ASEI on the selloff that started before the DJIA collapsed at 3 PM, but intensified from there. homeland security with a new-fangled imaging technology that distinguishes material by atomic number (in shades of grey) so plutonium, uranium, and lead would all be black, which could set off an alarm based on computer pattern recognition. TSA stopped groping people's breasts after they got a lot of complaints. ASEI was picked by Motley Fool as their best choice for a small-cap winner this year in one of their areas, though they've split into so many pieces, it's more accurate to call them the Motley Fools (plural).
looks like i have to lick my wounds from not selling a few stocks when they had unrealized appreciation and have now swooned. my risk capital is getting low. and i needto take a rest. i've been getting into a state of nervous exhaustion over the stock market and my trading. time to take a break. i'm not logging in to Ameritrade now to get RT quotes and look at L2. delayed quotes from Yahoo with my watchlist of stocks and their quotes and news is good enough.
i really reached a state of total nervous exhaustion over CBLI and then COR. it's like i LOST MY MIND. and ... ummm ... that's kind of the reason i don't work on nuke safety anymore ... and to heck with anyone who figures out who i am ... small world, it is.
send me a PM if you want to communicate without posting it. nobody else here seems to be interested in COR or our stock picks.