listen to the HEPH CC. Protectan is literally years behind Neumune, which has already met all the HHS requirements per their procurment. HHS is lying if they said that it did not satisfy the technical requirements. HEPH is requesting a "debriefing" from HHS at which they should learn what excuses HHS has. per the CEO and COO, everyone at HEPH went into work yesterday in full expectation of a contract award for ARS from HHS. they were blindisided by the end-of-day RFP withdrawal and no explanation has yet been given to them as to any technical shortcomings in their responses to the RFP, as amended.
HEPH has a lot of friends in Congress who would block any runaround by CBLI. a CBLI "runaround" in the works with leaked information would get SEC a lot more angry than they did over the back-dated stock options. it *also* would be tied up in the courts for years as a botched procurement. look at some recent federal court cases reversing some big procurement decisions by DoD for examples.
my advice is to bet on the tortoise here, not the hare. Neumune is *still* being developed for hospital-acquired infection and if approved for that indication, it could be used off-label for ARS.
HEPH has a lot of friends in Congress who would block any runaround by CBLI. a CBLI "runaround" in the works with leaked information would get SEC a lot more angry than they did over the back-dated stock options. it *also* would be tied up in the courts for years as a botched procurement. look at some recent federal court cases reversing some big procurement decisions by DoD for examples.
my advice is to bet on the tortoise here, not the hare. Neumune is *still* being developed for hospital-acquired infection and if approved for that indication, it could be used off-label for ARS.