Kavanaugh is on fire

[Slartibartfast]

Rule of thumb: always assume a leftist is telling the exact opposite of the truth, especially when projecting their faults:

My "perverse pursuits" here?

WTF is behind YOUR perverse pursuits here?

You're NOT an American:





And you clearly despise us:





And yet you post here about our politics all the time. Why?

Delete your account, deranged interloper.

View attachment 192320

You can love and hate things at the same time, it is normal.

You need help

In the first few months I was on ET I said I was not, however, having thought about it and in explaining why I was concerned about the US I figured I am is a better explanation and when I switched I explained the background. The IRS would say I am, that is for sure.

If my mother is Amercian I technically am automatically. Also being brought up by an American mom well...

So get some help. You are so twisted up with your deceits you need some.

 

[Slartibartfast]

This kind of fucked up lunacy like Pointy, woman hating, cowardly, timid, authoratarian hating/loving butwhatabout conspiracy bullshit seeming to come from childhood traumas is a signature of the Trump supporters around here.

 

[vanzandt]

This kind of fucked up lunacy like Pointy, woman hating, cowardly, timid, authoratarian hating/loving butwhatabout conspiracy bullshit seeming to come from childhood traumas is a signature of the Trump supporters around here.

Don't you have a water aerobics class to go to?
Tell that girl VZ says "whats up".

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Heh. Kavanaugh guest lectures and teaches a law course at Harvard.

And all the lefty students are foaming at the mouth there and demanding that he not teach.

But Kavanaugh recently sent a letter saying he "cannot commit" to teaching his regular January course there. Which causes the lefties to declare victory and wet their pants over all their new-found power.

Ahhh, okay. Consider the possibility that that is Kavanaugh giving them notice that he could be on the Supreme Court then and has to give his full attention to that. Just maybe, eh?

 

[Poindexter]

If my mother is Amercian I technically am automatically.

Bullshit. It's NOT automatic. Certain conditions must be met.

But we can't trust your word for her citizenship or meeting the conditions because you're a compulsive, serial liar.

And you've repeatedly and unambiguously said you're NOT and American and you've made your contempt for us crystal clear.

 

[Poindexter]

This woman is an associate professor at Georgetown.

In her defense, at least she didn't throw ice at anyone

 

[constitutionman]

This woman is an associate professor at Georgetown.

In her defense, at least she didn't throw ice at anyone

View attachment 192326

End of the day, vote this man to the position of Supreme Court Justice, and democrats, go find a dark place, put a gun in your mouths, and do the right thing.

You are not to be trusted, you have completely and totally lost all credibility, and most of all you're fucking dangerous to freedom, so yes, put that motherfucking cold steel in your mouth and die.

Before posting crap from other stupid people, ask your comrade "CaptianObvious" who in on this board to explain himself with his despicable and violent posts.

 

[Tom B]

The cartoon is trivializing Ford's allegations. And you are complicit in propagating that trivialization.

Which part did you not understand?

Wrong yet again. The cartoon is not trivializing Ford's allegations. Ford could not provide any credible collaborating evidence pertaining to her allegations. She has contradicted herself repeatedly. The other accusers are not credible.

As a result, Democrats have changed their attacks on Kavanaugh. The frivolous attacks include lying about his high school yearbook entry, throwing ice, drinking, farting, inside jokes, etcetera. Now there are people with an axe to grind, accusing him of being drunk, and acting immature. That is what the cartoon is about.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Are you wasting your time debating with the nitwit constitutionman? He's another radical leftist trying to pose as a Libertarian.

I'm trying to see if that is the case. In this thread, he/she has certainly been following a theme.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Sure,

For your first question, my answer is two folds, Yes from the process standpoint, he should get the vote and No from my personal standpoint. (As I mentioned it before, he blew it the way he handled himself)

For your second question, Yes he has been treated fairly given the seriousness of the accusations, that doesn't mean the Dems handled the situation smoothly.

Ok, but I asked if you believed the process of scrutiny is equally applied. Ie, are the Democrats applying a much greater level of scrutiny to this process beyond what other potential appointees in the past have received, or other politicians.